Laserfiche WebLink
Property Taxes <br /> Before the passage of Ballot Measure <br /> 50 and the resulting introduction of a <br /> rate-based tax system, there was little .Oppose any modifications or ~corrections" <br /> competition between the public-policy to Measure 50 that reduce revenue to cities <br /> goals associated with exemptions and without full reimbursement from the State. <br /> the public-service activities carried <br /> out under a local government's .Oppose any modification to urban renewal <br /> budget. Even if a property was that affects maximum revenue collection <br /> exempted from taxation, the city's authority granted to urban renewal agencies <br /> under Measure 50 that would reduce urban <br /> levy remained intact, and the revenue <br /> was replaced by shifting the renewal revenues, cause compression where <br /> obligation to the remaining taxable compression does not exist under current <br /> properties, law, or that requires any retroactive <br /> reimbursement of tax revenue already <br /> This is no longer the case. Now, collected. <br /> <br /> property tax exemptions reduce <br /> revenue to cities. If the amount of <br /> assessed value is reduced because a <br /> property is exempted, then the amount <br /> of tax revenue collected is reduced. Without another form of revenue to replace the <br /> property tax loss, the result is fewer city services or reduced service levels. In fact, state- <br /> granted property tax exemptions are simply state expenditures of scarce local government <br /> revenue without consideration of the local government's priorities or needs. <br /> <br /> The realities of the new property tax environment faced by local government raise serious <br /> concerns about a) granting exemptions or other property tax reductions; and b) <br /> exemptions of intangible property. <br /> <br /> a. Granting Exemptions or Other Property Tax Reductions <br /> <br /> There is a concern that the State can grant property tax exemptions without <br /> regard to the impact such exemptions will have on local property-tax-dependent <br /> jurisdictions. It is recognized, however, that regardless of the revenue impact, <br /> there may be occasions when property tax exemptions or deferrals are the best <br /> method of serving a city's long-term interests. In those cases, the decision to <br /> grant an exemption should be made at the local level, rather than by the State. <br /> <br /> If, however, the State grants property tax exemptions or other property tax <br /> reductions without the approval of the taxing jurisdiction, the State should <br /> reimburse cities for the resulting revenue loss. <br /> <br /> The Tax Expenditure Report highlights a number of property tax exemptions that <br /> may no longer serve their public policy objective. Local governments would be <br /> well served by a thorough review of all of these expenditures. <br /> <br /> Recommendations: <br /> <br />City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session 10 <br /> <br /> <br />