Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution of employment disputes through voluntary agreement between the parties is <br /> preferred to procedures which impose settlements by a third party. <br /> <br /> 4. INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT <br /> <br /> The City supports expanding the existing exemption afforded to cable television <br /> companies from electrical permit and licensing requirements to include all forms of <br /> communications cable (e.g., coaxial and fiber optic). These types of installations do not <br /> require the knowledge, skills and abilities represented by a commercial electrician's <br /> license. Cities should not be required to pay the associated fees and expenses of using <br /> licensed electricians to install telephone and computer cable and equipment. These <br /> requirements do not result in improved personnel or building safety. <br /> <br />D. LIQUOR LICENSING <br /> <br /> To sustain safe, livable neighborhoods, local government recommendations regarding the <br /> issuance of liquor licenses should have greater weight when the Oregon Liquor Control <br /> Commission acts on license applications. Adverse recommendations by local governments <br /> should have ;;presumptive" effect, meaning that a liquor license applicant would have to show <br /> good cause to overcome an adverse recommendation from a city. <br /> <br /> Prior to 1988, adverse local government recommendations regarding issuance of liquor licenses <br /> did have a presumptive effect. The Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) defined <br /> presumptive effect as meaning that once an applicant received an adverse recommendation based <br /> on OLCC approval criteria, the OLCC would not issue a license unless the applicant was able to <br /> show good cause that outweighed the local recommendation. <br /> <br /> In 1988, the Attorney General issued an opinion stating that OLCC licensing criterion concerning <br /> a local governing body endorsement was invalid, that by giving presumptive effect to adverse <br /> local government recommendations, the Commission was delegating its licensing authority to <br /> local governments unlawfully. The OLCC deleted the language and current language now states: <br /> ;;Local government, other government agencies, organizations, facilities or individuals may give <br /> the Commission reliable factual information concerning whether there is a basis to grant or deny <br /> a license or to impose license restrictions .... " <br /> <br /> Creating (or re-establishing) a presumption against a license when an unfavorable <br /> recommendation is forwarded by a local jurisdiction should be pursed. Such a change in the <br /> statutes would allow local governing bodies a greater role in the licensing process. Local <br /> recommendations would carry greater weight, while OLCC would play more of a reviewing role <br /> and would maintain statewide criterion, thus maintaining consistency in licensing matters across <br /> the state. <br /> <br /> By applying a local government recommendation as a presumption, more of a burden would be <br /> placed on the licensee to show good cause to overcome the recommendation. The local <br /> <br />City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2005 Session 50 <br /> <br /> <br />