My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-12/06/04Mtg
>
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:55 PM
Creation date
12/1/2004 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
187 CELL TOWERS CELL TOWER~ ll~8 <br /> You will need to know which board is responsible for writing such An ~ of Zoning: <br /> ro~,ulations. It may not be the same board as is given the siting powers, or /47uat It Can -And Cannot Do - According To FederalLaw. <br /> later -- enfOrcement powers. For instance, in Massachusetts, tho planning <br /> board may.write the regulations, but a Special Permit Granting Authority The parameters of zoning for "personal wireless' servic~ facilities" <br /> (SPGA) may be the board of selectmen or the zoning ~_~d of appeals are sot out in federal law, in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section <br /> (ZBA). 704.' <br /> Once you've determined the specifics of your situation, find out '"~' Cutting through the lngaleso of the Telecom Act, a colmnu~ can <br /> when and whore the decision-making board meets. Attend some meetings ' still regulate many aspects of tower siting. Where a tower is located, how <br /> to get a flavor for the personalities of the board member~ and a sense of tall it can be, what caa go on tho tower, and how such installations arc <br /> the way they approach their work. monitored for radiofi'equency (RF)'e~ssions to make sure they are in <br /> - It helps to contact other municipalities for information, or local compliance with the FCC standards -- among many other things, still fall <br /> newspapers that have run articles about other tower-siting scenarios, under local jurisdiction. But, there are better and certa~y worse ways of <br /> Network. You will find that people who have been active in this field love going about the exorcise of that control. <br /> to share their stories, expertise, and resources. Consider placing an ad in The Telecom Act also stipulates that communities must bo carotid <br /> tho local newspaper to attract other citizens wh0are concerned. An ad as' i in denying pormit~. Deniala _~___hould bo for substantial r~asons minted inca <br /> simple as: "Interested in the issue of cellular towers in our neighborhoods? written record of tho proceedings. Tho better tho zonln-.° regulations are,, <br /> Call mo at..." .will cost only a few dollars and may help you begin a <br /> citizens group that can share the workload- ~ inappropriate. Good regulations are tho blueprint for successful <br /> le~d <br />It's fair to ~ay one person cannot'do this alone. Few people have .~ actions, should that como to pass. <br />the spare time,, energy, or tenacity to move SUch issues onto center stage What a community cannot do is to completely ban personal <br />and ~e public officials to act constructively. Plus, there is power in. wireless service from that community. Does that mean it must allow a <br />numbe~... No city council, or planning board can afford to ignore a room tower or base station within the community? Not necessarily. If tho <br />full of p~ople who have a clear agenda. But they have little problem ~ company could provide service fi.om another adjacent community, and is <br />ignoring one citizen (or even a small group) whom they can dismiss as ~:" already located on a tower in that nearby town, whore by addling <br />NIMBY's. .~:' · -- <br /> By organizing your neighbors and others throughout the ~. antennas they could also cover your town m then you might be able to <br /> keep that company from building a now tower in your town.2 Tho bask <br />community, you will develop a larger, voice that will attract tho local ~ legal argument is that your town is not p~ tho company from <br />media. When you attend municipal' meetings to speak about tho issues, .:~, providing service to tho community but rather disaliowing.a now base <br />you will be heard in a very different way than before. ~ ~ station to be ere~tccl within town boundaries. Th~ reason for doing so is <br />Om' local group in Great Barrington, Massachusetts ~ Folks for ~:, ' that the company can already provide service fi.om aa existing tow~ to <br />Appropriate 'Cellular Tower Sites, or FACTS ~ became a force to be <br /> .'; which the company already has legal access. <br />reckoned with when it could consistently, and .on very short notice, get · '~' Under the Telecom Act, communities cannot "unreaso~i~ <br />fifty or .so people to any meeting where the .tower issues were up for ' discriminate among providers. This means the town cannot block one <br />disou~on. It did not matter than only about three or four of those people ~ cellular company from providing' service in tho community if' other <br />were really wo~in8 diligently on th issue; Tho-grOup took on a force far <br />greater than the individual efforts of the members. <br /> <br /> / .... ? ~ 2Reccntcasolawsuppoflsthi_~_ Sco Jam~Hobsoll's~ CdhdlrT?-'~llo <br /> . ,, , Co. v. Zo~i~ 13cad or. Adjumum. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.