My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-12/06/04Mtg
>
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:55 PM
Creation date
12/1/2004 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
191 CEIL TOWERS C~-~ J. TOWERS 192 <br /> <br /> and fewer lawsuits by the industry (if applications are denied)' or by irate Moratoriums <br /> citizens (if siting deCisions are poor ones.) r-- <br /> A 'note of caution, however, is warranted. Do not invite the If the town needs time to study the issuc, 8oin8 into a moratorium T <br />industry in' on early planning efforts in the name -of listening to all period is thc wisest thing to do. During thc pre--dztmmined time-pesiod, no ~ <br />"stakobolders." Be wary when they "want to help thc town." They are applications can be accepted, therefore no legal obligation exists to act n <br />skilled at co-opting the local process and you may find yourself pulled them. A moratorium is espeCially helpful before applications come in. It <br />mOre toward accommodating their needs than your own. Such co-optation will give the town breathing room to do a proactive job of crew_ ti%a good <br />can be subtle. It often seems friendly. They want to help you "avoid law zoning regulations. Ifa town is not in a legal moratorium, any applications <br />mits" t which can be a veiled threat. Inviting them to thc planning table for teleCOm sites will apply to whatever regulations are in lJlace at tho <br />will also provide an. early window into town dynamics and give them an time. Telecom providers have been known to flood some towns with <br />edge later on. applications just before the start of a moratorium in order to'avoid sh-lcter <br /> Another note of caution: most telecommunications cngince~ng regulatiOns. <br />fu'ms work 'for thc industry and so .would have a conflict of interest in The FCC has set out voluntary moratorium guidelines for <br />· working for a community. But there are competent indcpend, ent engineers communities? In. general, moratoriums cannot bo used as smokcScrzens <br />who can provide what'the town needs. This is where networkin8 with for obstruction. They cannot be indcfinite,s They must bo good-faith <br />other towns is especially helpful: You may be. able .to find out the names efforts to 8ct one's regulatory house in order. Many communities begin <br />of one or more engineers from other town boards. If not, try local with a three-month t_ime frame and extend it to six months, if neces,saO,. <br />universities with engineering departments. The EMR Network also ~ Thosc areconsideredreasonableperiods. <br />reconuneZds indcl~ndent engineers to municipalities? Ask for references Any applications that are pendi_ng before the moratorium must be <br />from other towns thc individual has worked for. When you contact those . t heard in a timely manner. The moratorium will not apply.to them. <br />references, you will have found a g01d mine of information- not just A mOratorium is a legal entity. It must bo enacted by the <br />about the engineer you are thinking about hiring, but also about the : appropriate authority in your town. Moratorimn language should be <br />process th other town went throush, the lcssons they learned, and thc ~ preCise and include a statement that the purpose of tho moratofimn is to <br />pitfalls they encountered. ~ develop appropriate regulations to control the placemen~ construction, and <br /> The other important expert you will need is a lawyer who is t, modification of personal wireless service facilities, in accordance with thc <br />familiar with the recent telecommunications case laTM. In 1996 when the , TeleCOmmunications Act of 1996, and applicable state and local laws. The <br />Telecom Act was passed, very little such case law existed' regarding where , time-period must be sPeCified. Extensions should bo VOted on again. <br />this technology intersects with the rights of local governance. Today, that ., Once a moratorium is in place, the communiW must work quickly <br />case law is accumulating. Many important deCisions in federal courts back ~ on the bylaws you will be drafting. <br />local decision*making powers. The town's mUnicipal attorney may not be <br />familiar with the implications of these decisions, often, the municipal How l)o You Start?. <br />. attorney de. fin s his or her mandate as avoiding lawsuits for the town and ~ <br />may advise the path of least resistance. But, this not the best course of " It helps to define your goals up front: <br />a~tion with this particular issue. Towns need not roll over for the telecom ~ <br />industry. · la What are we trying to accomplish? <br /> · la Is our goal to place facilities in specific locations? <br /> <br />~.S~~~-~&Fforwebsites. *-"-'~ 6Afed~lleouttuphe, ldo~eommuaity'$sighltotwo, lm~4o.l~six, .... ~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.