Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I~, V I I,/V Iq. CONCORD ZONING the Bom'd finds that the extent of the gr~I'ltcd relief is mitigated by a showing that the project provides a minimally intrusive viable means of reducing or eliminating suer significant gap in coverage, and where the Board finds that the desired relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the neighborhood and without derogating from thc intent and prolapse of this Bylaw. However, the Board shall not grant relief from the maximum height limitation in subsection 7.8.4.2(e). The Board shall be 'empowered to grmat relief from any setback requirement ha subsection 7.8.4.2(i), (j) or (k) provided that the site proposed is demonstrated to be necessary re achieve adequate coverage or capacity and to be minimally intrusive upon the interests of thc Town, consistent with Section 7.8.1 Purpose and Intent (a) through (e). The applicant shall provide the Board with a written statement describing why the requested relief is in the best interest of the Town wida references to Section 7.8.1 Purpose andlrttent (a) through (¢)." 7. 8.4. 6 At~t~rovctl c. rit, vio: A spec ial permit shall be issued un der this section Only i f the Board shall find that the project is in hamaony with the general purpose and intent of this Section. In addition, the Board, in consultation with the indcpendcnt eonsultaat referred to in subsection 7.8.4.3 shall make all the applicable findings before granting the special pennit, as follows: (a2 that the applicant is not already providing adequate coverage and/or adequate capacity and that a significant gap in coverage exists; (b) that the applicant is not able to use existing personal wireless co:m~unication, facility site(s) either with or without the use of filler sites to provide adequate coverage_and adequate c~pacity; (~.') that the proposed personal wireless communication facility site selected by the applicant minimizes adverse impacts on historic resources, scenic views (viewshcds) and residential property values by being located most distant from historic resources, scenic views (viewsheds) and single-family detached d.wellings, (d) that the proposed personal wireless communication 'facility site minimizes adverse impacts on historic resources, scenic views, residential property values and natural or man-made resources through the use of camouflage, stealtll or other innovative mcbnology'; (e) that rdae applicant has agreed to implement all reasonable measnres to mitigate the potential adverse impacts of the facilities; (f) that the proposal shall comply with floe appropriate [:CC Regulations regarding en'dssions of electr.oma~aetie radiation and that the required monitoring program is in place ancl shall be paid ibr by the applicant; and (g) that the applicant has agreed ~0 rent or lease available space on the tower, under terms of a fair-market lease, without discrimination to other Personal wireless service providers; If a special permit is grm~ted the Board shall impose any such additional conditions and safeguards as public safety, welfare and convenience may require, either as reconmaended by the independent consultant, ~;he Planning Board or upon its own initiative. 72