My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-12/06/04Mtg
>
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:55 PM
Creation date
12/1/2004 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ~'~lccornr~uniea~ion.~ orrlin,,moo <br /> <br /> Subject: Re: Telecommunications ordinance <br /> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:22:42 +0000 <br /> From: "Martin Connor" <mjconnor(~hotmail.com> <br /> To: charb~presys.¢om <br /> <br /> aaar Mol'la, <br /> <br /> Sorry our regulations are not yet online, I would be glad to mail them to you or fax the sections on <br /> telecommunications. Your ordinace or fee schedule should be written to allow you to hire e×perts at the <br /> applicants expense to review the application. We hire an RF Engineer to review the application and be <br /> available during the public hearing process. That was key in a denial which went to litigation when ! <br /> worked for the Town of Litchfie[d CT. Our denial held up in Yedera] Court. as the technical <br /> information supplied by the applicant was woefully inadequate, We would not have known that without <br /> our own KF Engineer, I also recommend that your ordinance allow for bonding for removal of the tower <br /> and require annua} RF emission reports. These 2 provtsiorls' 'give a small degree of comfort to thc usually <br /> very unhappy neighbors, <br /> <br /> Marty Connor <br /> <br /> >From: Mona Linstromberg <br /> >To: MlConnor~hotmail.com <br /> >Subject: Telecommunications ordinance <br /> >Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 22:49:38 -0500 <br /> > <br /> <br /> >I am writing from Lane County, Oregon. Next Tuesday we will have our <br /> >first hearing before the Planning Commission on a proposed dral~ <br /> >ordinance for the siting of te[ecommunications facilities. We had <br /> >ordered copies of "model" ordinances to give us some clue as to what <br /> >other jurisdictions were doing. One was from Warren, CT. I called <br /> >today to find out the status of that ordinance and see if it had <br /> >withstood the test of time, I spoke with Dan McGinnis (sp?), and he <br /> >gave me your e-mail address, He mentioned that Torrington had been <br /> >involved in some litigation. I do not have that ordinance but would <br /> >appreciate if you could give me some background or point me in the right <br /> >direction for getting a copy of the ordinance and any court eases, <br /> >Thank you so very much. Mona <br /> > <br /> <br /> Subject: Re: Telecommunications ordinance <br /> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:22:11 +0000 <br /> From: "Martin Connor' <mjconnor~hotma[I,com> <br /> To: charb~presys.com <br /> <br /> Its Mm-tin J Connor, AICP, City Planner, Torrington CT, We'll send you a copy of the rags today, <br /> <br /> 01/01/2002 1:47 PM <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.