Laserfiche WebLink
h 1997 Eugene adopted Our telecommunication devised siting requirements and. <br />procedures section of our code, section 9.5750. The purposes of that code were to: <br /> <br /> 1. minimize the number of towers throughout our community <br /> 2. encourage collocation of facilities <br /> · 3.. encourage the use of existing buildings, or poles as opposed to constructing new <br /> towers <br /> 4. 'recognize the need of providers to build out their systems & <br /> 5. ensure that facilities are designed to minimize the visual impact on the immediate <br /> surroundings & throughout the community, minimize public inconvenience & <br /> disruption~ <br /> <br />Go through numbers on chart. <br /> <br />The code attempts to promote ·collocati°n by streamlining the process by allowing <br />outright, antenna collocations in most zones and by putting restrictions and limitations on <br />collocations in some of our more sensitive zones./... · <br /> <br />Regarding new towers~ our code allows them outright''~mdustrial and our <br />commercial/industrials, x _~ hybrid zone, C-4. Our code requires site review, a slightly more <br />complicated process il' y~u're ih a public lands zone or some of our other commercial <br />zones, and if the proposal is in our more sensitive single family, commercial and general <br />office zones, a conditional use permit is required. <br /> <br />New transmission towers are prohibited by our code in Agriculture, R-2, R-3, R-4, <br />Historic, Natural Resource and Parks, Recreation & Open zones, in the Willamette <br />Greenway, on Gillespie Butte above 450' in elevation, on the ridgeline defined ih the <br />south hills study or on Judkins point. <br /> <br />Our code currently outlines submittal requirements for new toWers and includes a <br />requirement that documentation demonstrating compliance with non-ionizing <br />electromagnetic radiation (NIER)emissions standards as set forth by the Federal <br />Communications Commission. If a proposal is kicked into a site review or conditional <br />use situation, if it's in one of those situations I described earlier, documentation also must <br />· be submitted showing that alternative sites within 2000 feet have been considered and are <br />determined to by unfeasible or unavailable, code asks applicants to consider sites that are <br />ih some of the less sensitive zones (industrial and heavy commercial). Also required is <br />evidence that demonstrates it is impractical to collocate on tall buildings, light poles or <br />existing towers and it outlines reasons that are acceptable about why it would be <br />infeasible. <br /> <br />New towers have to be at least 2000 feet away from towers that existed prior to adoption <br />of the code in 1997. <br /> <br /> IV-19 <br /> <br /> <br />