My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-12/06/04Mtg
>
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:55 PM
Creation date
12/1/2004 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br /> AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY <br /> <br /> October 12, 2004 <br /> <br /> To: Eugene Planning Commission <br /> <br /> From: Eugene Planning Division; City Attorney's Office <br /> <br /> Re: Amendments to Cell Tower Siting Ordinance <br /> <br />Action Requested: To make a recommendation to the City Council regarding proposed <br /> amendments to EC 9.5750 (Telecommunications Devices - Siting <br /> Requirements and Procedures) <br /> <br />Brief Summary of Agenda Item: <br /> <br />At a work session on April 14, 2004, the City Council adopted a motion to initiate amendments <br />to EC 9.5750 to (1) extend setbacks for new cell towers to 1000 feet from the nearest school and <br />800 feet from the nearest residences; (2) codify the requirement for independent consultant <br />review and verification; and (3) codify zero tolerance for interference with public safety <br />communications. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The current version of EC 9.5750 is substantively the same as Council adopted in Ordinance <br />20078 in 1997, shortly after Congress adopted the Federal Telecommunications Act in 1996. <br />The ordinance responded to an increasing number of requests to construct cell towers and related <br />facilities that accompanied the rapid growth of cellular phone service. <br /> <br />Federal law places substantial restrictions on cities' ability to 'regulate siting of <br />telecommunications facilities, but in many cases the extent of those restrictions is not well <br />settled. It is clear, however, that cities may not adopt regulations that either "prohibit or have <br />the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." The potential impacts of <br />federal law on the proposed ordinance are discussed in more detail below. <br /> <br />The Council is scheduled to hold a pubic hearing on the proposed amendments on November 22, <br />2004. <br /> <br />Code Amendment Approval Criteria <br /> <br />The proposed changes are a City-initiated Type V application. If Council chooses to adOpt the <br />amendments, it must find that the amendments are cOnsistent with (a) applicable statewide <br />planning goals and Co) applicable provisions of the Metro Plan and applicable provisions, if any, <br />of adopted refinement plans. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.