Laserfiche WebLink
from setting up regulations that preserve property values, or protect against <br />attractive nuisance. A strong setback requirement is the backbone of the. <br />ordinance. This variance proposal as written weakens the whole ordinance, gives <br />the upper hand to industry, and leaves homeowners withoUt recourse. I do not <br />understand the rationale for spending City funds to amend the ordinance if the <br />changes will result in a loophole of this nature. ' <br /> <br />On the other hand, the amendment to section (ll) has my heartiest approval. <br />Independent technical review, is much needed, and will relieve Planning staff of a <br />task for which they are not qualified. <br /> <br />I appreciate the' opportunity to comment on these proposed changes to the <br />ordinance, and I would love to see the langUage that is submitted to the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Kind Regards, <br /> <br />Eugene OR ~74o4 <br /> <br /> IV-55 <br /> <br /> <br />