My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-12/06/04Mtg
>
Item 6 - PH/Cell Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:55 PM
Creation date
12/1/2004 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Eugene City Council and Mayor TorreY; Dennis Taylor, City Manager <br /> From: Citizens for Responsible Placement of Cell Phone Transmission Towers <br /> Regarding: Revisions to Eugene's Telecommunications Ordinance <br /> <br /> 1/7/04 <br /> Ladies and Gentlemen: <br /> Our original submission to the City Council, dated 10/2/02, is attached for your <br /> review. This includes our analysis of the existing telecommunications Code; a <br /> model ordinance from Great Barrington MA; information on property devaluation' <br /> associated with cell phone towers; as well as copies of the Lane County Code <br /> and EC'9.5750. The Lane County Telecommunications Code has been . <br /> amended, since we originally compiled this packet, and the updated version is <br /> · included as Attachment G. Lane County's .Telecommunications Code requires a <br /> setback of 1200 feet from the nearest residence or School. It is time for the City <br /> Of Eugene to take comparable actions in service of its citizens. <br /> <br /> We have added a letter from the National League of Cities in support of the <br /> federal Local Control of Broadcast Towers Act (S3102), and Local COntrol of <br />· Cellular Towers Act (S3103). You will find this in your packet as Attachment I. <br />The letter from the National League of Cities makes clear that conflict over tower <br />siting has been problematic for cities all over the U.S. The best solution will be <br />federal legislation which restores local COntrol over siting .and construction of <br />telecom infrastructure. Until that happens, local governments must take action <br />to protect citizens.from attractive nuisance, property devaluation, and visual <br />blight resulting' from inappropriate siting of transmission towers. To quote from <br />the concluding paragraph of the letter: "While local zoning control over cell <br />towers may seem burdensome to telecommunications providers, it is no greater <br />a hurdle than that faced by all other businesses who are applying to build in any <br />giv n city or town." <br /> <br />Respectfully, <br /> <br />Mona Linstromberg and Martha Johnson <br />Citizens for Responsible Placement of Cell Phone Transmission Towers <br /> <br /> IV-69 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.