Laserfiche WebLink
condominium buyers be consulted regarding the MUPT] !. He noted that the Budget Committee often <br />struggled with small allocations and underwent a detailed prioritization while the City Council proposed a <br />"$2 million allocation with relaxed abandon." He alleged the public benefit was to expedite development <br />of land that was certain to be developed anyway. / <br /> ! <br />Charles Biggs, 540 Antelope Way, wished to convey hi~ support for retention of the Low-Income <br />Housing Dispersal Policy as written. He thought staff x~as likely going to propose dismantling it. He felt <br />the policy seemed to have positive benefits. He assertecl that the reason staff was discussing this was <br />because the planning process for acquiring land was not working. He alleged that the only land remaining <br />for low-income housing was next to low-income housinl ;. He opined that this was a result of such housing <br />lowering property values. He encouraged the council to expand the dispersal policy and not to abolish it. <br />He said it was to the cormnunity's benefit to have low-i~ tcome housing dispersed throughout the City. <br /> <br />Mort Ityman, 3863 Dorchester Lane, circulated a phot~ ~graph of the land that could potentially be <br />developed in the McDougal land swap. He noted he als represented the SCCSPOS. He opposed the land <br />swap because he felt it would hurt the neighborhood ant would not provide the park the area needed, due <br />to a lack of funding for its development. He asked if th~: populace was willing to give up a portion of its <br />ever-decreasing supply of Class 1 soils in order to provi ]e land for another residential development. He <br />questioned the wisdom of allowing the urban growth bo andary (UGB) to be expanded to suit the purposes <br />of one developer. He asked if allowing streets that were already overburdened by traffic to be further <br />clogged would be prudent. He conveyed the committee's agreement that more parks were needed, but <br />reiterated its opposition to this particular land swap. In closing, he stated that more than 800 signatures <br />had been gathered on a petition to express this oppositk n. <br /> <br />Mr. Hyman invited councilors to join the committee for one or more meetings of the SCCSPOS, held at 6 <br />p.m. on the 2nd and 4th Thursdays of the month at the Sa: ~ta Clara Grange Hall on Azalea Drive <br /> <br />Clark Winston Cox, Jr., 1085 Patterson Street, Apartn lent 9, said his landlord was a partner to the <br />developer of the proPosed MUPTE at 979 Patterson Str,,~et. He stated that the West University Neighbors <br />had submitted a letter and he acknowledged that there ,a'as some opposition to the MUPTE mostly for <br />reasons previously stated by Mr. Wolfe. He thought thc: development at 979 Patterson Street would result <br />in higher quality housing stock than what exists in the a rea. He stated that the exemption for the new <br />building would not raise anyone's tax bill as it would b~', taxed for ten years in its current existing <br />capacity, i.e. a parking lot. He supported granting the 1~ [UPTE for the Patterson Street development. He <br />wished everyone a happy Thanksgiving. <br /> <br />Mariah Leavitt, 1458 West 10th Avenue, commended the City Council and especially Mayor Torrey for <br />their commitment to listen to Santa Clara residents and for the proposal to conduct a survey. She <br />considered the potential development of farmland to be important enough that the proposal should be <br />rejected on that basis alone. She recalled that the prop¢ sal was to move 197 acres of land within the UGB <br />in order to create 77 acres of park and 120 acres of dew :lopment. She stressed that farmland was an <br />irreplaceable asset to the community. <br /> <br />Ms. Leavitt noted that the Lane County Farmers Marke: grossed $1.27 million in 2002 and brought <br />uncounted revenue gains to downtown businesses by at :racting customers to the downtown area on <br />Saturdays and Tuesdays. She cited a study in Dane Col tnty, Wisconsin, that found the average farmers <br />market customer spent $22.47 at other downtown area ! ~usinesses. She stated that such a market could not <br />exist without farmers and the farmers could not farm w: thout quality farmland. She shared that she <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 22, 2004 Page 2 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />