Laserfiche WebLink
City, but the property owner could choose to ignore the City's process. Councilor Meisner stated that the <br />problem with this was that a property owner could do so as aproforma action to get into the court and the <br />City could, meanwhile, rack up fees which would later become a lien. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman requested amendment language for the creation of a mechanism in order to track out- <br />of-state owners. She also asked for amendment language to require that an appraiser have no business or <br />personal relationship with the property owner. She suggested, too, that staff provide amendment language <br />for her that expanded the area required to be noticed. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 asked if the ordinance prohibited the council from saying that a land use waiver ended <br />with the sale of the property. Mr. Klein replied that the default was that the waiver would go away. <br />Councilor Pap6 surmised that the council could say the waiver should remain with the property. Mr. <br />Klein then responded that the question was whether Ballot Measure 37 actually authorized this. He stated <br />that home rule authority did not apply to override the measure. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor P~p6, Mr. Klein stated that a person was not required to hire an <br />appraiser but in the course of litigating a claim in court, it would be difficult for a land owner to prove a <br />loss of value without one. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey recommended that staff bring some language that indicated that a land use waiver should be <br />transferable with a property, unless Ballot Measure 37 did not allow it. He preferred taking that position <br />rather than assuming the court would support such a move. He also agreed that staff should bring a <br />proposal to the Wednesday work session for a fee cap of some kind. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion to table passed, 5:3; Councilors Bettman, <br /> Taylor, and Kelly voting in opposition. <br /> <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> An Ordinance Establishing the S-HK Historic Kaufman House Special Area Zone; Amending <br /> Section 9.8865 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and Amending the Eugene Zoning Map <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey stated that the matter was a quasi-judicial one and asked if councilors had conflicts of <br />interest to disclose. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman disclosed that she had visited the site approximately one year ago and had visited with <br />residents in the area. She did not feel this represented an actual conflict of interest. <br /> <br />No other councilors indicated a conflict of interest. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br /> Terri Harding, 132 East Broadway, Suite 536, explained that she was representing the Facilities <br /> Management Division of the Central Services Department. She said the item before the council was the <br /> creation of a special area zone for the Kaufman Senior Center. She stated that no funding had been <br /> allocated by the City for programs for senior citizens at that location since 1998. She related that, since <br /> July 2003, the Emerald Empire Council on Aging had been operating senior programs at the Kaufman <br /> House. The City provided free rent and major maintenance funding for two years, as per a resolution <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 22, 2004 Page 14 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />