My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B - Transport. Funding
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 01/19/05 WS
>
Item B - Transport. Funding
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:39 PM
Creation date
1/12/2005 1:44:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/19/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br /> converters to function more effectively. Federal rules require by 2006 that all diesel fuel sold in the <br /> United States will have low sulfur levels. By 2007, all new diesel engine vehicles must have emission <br /> control devices, which are estimated to be 95% effective in eliminating particulates and hydrocarbon <br /> emissions. However, there is a cost to retrofitting vehicles for the emission control devices, and the <br /> ULSD itself is currently about 15-cents more per gallon than regular diesel. Grants are currently <br /> available to offset the higher cost of ULSD as well as to assist school districts in retrofitting school buses <br /> with emission control devices to attain the full pollution-reducing benefit of ULSD. <br /> <br /> While the City of Eugene is an active participant in the Lane Clean Diesel Project, staff is not <br /> recommending that Eugene's scarce pavement preservation resources be used to subsidize the cost of <br /> making ultra-low sulfur diesel available in Eugene on an accelerated schedule, since the use of ULSD <br /> will be mandatory by June 2006, regardless of short-term incentives which the City might offer for early <br /> implementation of the regulations. <br /> <br />· What is the basis for staffs' recommendation for an 80% refund of city tax for diesel fuel sold for <br /> vehicles also subject to the weight-mile tax and being faeled at their owner's bulk fueling facilities within <br /> the city limits? <br /> <br /> In July 2004, the Springfield City Council considered testimony that a significant number of companies <br /> with bulk diesel fueling facilities servicing their own fleets within the Springfield city limits traveled <br /> only a minor proportion of their mileage on Springfield streets. As a result, it was concluded that the <br /> local companies operating those vehicles were likely paying a disproportionate share of the local fuel tax <br /> compared to the miles driven on local streets. The Springfield council subsequently adopted an <br /> amendment to its fuel tax ordinance that authorized an 80% refund of city tax for diesel fuel sold for <br /> vehicles also subject to the state weight-mile tax which were fueled at their owner's bulk fueling facility <br /> within the city limits. <br /> <br /> A number of local companies in Eugene also have bulk diesel fuel facilities servicing their own fleets <br /> within the city limits. Some of these companies have compiled data to support their assertion that the <br /> majority of the miles driven by their diesel-fueled fleets (i.e., 90-95%) are not driven on Eugene streets. <br /> As was the situation in Springfield, this results in a disproportionate tax burden to these companies. Like <br /> the Springfield bulk fuelers, these local business owners are concerned about the competitive <br /> disadvantage created by a Eugene fuel tax when applied to their diesel-fueled fleets which are being <br /> driven primarily outside the Eugene city limits. <br /> <br /> Neither ODOT nor the city tracks data establishing the number of miles driven by local bulk fuelers on <br /> city streets. The 80% refund level approved by the Springfield City Council was a concession which <br /> attempted to acknowledge that local companies with bulk fueling facilities in the city limits benefit from <br /> a well-maintained transportation system, while also acknowledging that payment in full of the city fuel <br /> tax creates a competitive disadvantage which may be deemed unfair when one considers that their <br /> weight-mile fleets are driven primarily outside the city limits. State Fuels Tax Group urged that, should <br /> Eugene choose to adopt a diesel refund provision, that we "mirror the Springfield ordinance in order to <br /> minimize the diversity of statues" which they are called upon to administer. <br /> <br /> Since Springfield implemented their diesel refund provision, three dealers have applied for certification <br /> for qualification for refund of the tax on diesel fuel purchases in bulk for use at their own facility, <br /> although no refunds have actually been granted at this time. Eugene estimates that the maximum <br /> financial impact of a refund at the 80% level would be in the $20,000 to $25,000 range for each level of <br /> 1-cent fuel tax imposed in Eugene--or approximately $60,000 to $75,000 annually at the current 3-cent <br /> tax level. In all likelihood, the revenue impact of such refunds would be significantly less, as not all <br /> diesel fuel sales are made to bulk fuelers. <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.