Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT A <br /> MINUTES <br /> <br /> Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations <br /> McNutt Room, City Hall <br /> <br /> August 31, 2004 <br /> 12~00 Noon <br /> <br />PRESENT~ Scott Meisner, Chair; David Kelly, Gary Pap6, members; Jason Heuser, Karen Hyatt, <br /> Greg Rikhoff, City Manager's Office; Moses S. Rodriguez, Intern <br /> <br />1. Call to Order and Review Agenda <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner called the meeting of the Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (CCIGR) to <br />order. With permission of the committee, he moved Item 4, Resolutions on Ballot Measures, to Item 2 on <br />the agenda. <br /> <br />2. Resolutions on Ballot Measures <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser introduced the item by explaining that City staff are not allowed to be involved in drafting <br />resolutions on ballot measures. Mr. Meisner then asked Mr. Rikhoffto explain a recent policy change on <br />ballot measure resolutions that affects appointed commission members' ability to consider them. Mr. <br />Rikhoff said City and County Attorneys have confirmed that appointed commissioners are now considered <br />to be employees for the purposes of involving themselves in legislation, and are unable to participate in any <br />process that would create a position on a ballot measure. Mr. Meisner noted that in the past appointed <br />commissions had taken positions on pending legislation and ballot measures, and that, for example, on <br />Ballot Measure 36, the normal process would have been for the CCIGR to ask the Human Rights Commis- <br />sion (HRC) to look at the measure and give the committee its advice. Now, he said, the HRC cannot do so. <br />Any recommendations to the City Council on legislation or ballot measures must come from the CCIGR. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 asked if commissions could be asked in general about their positions on issues. Mr. Heuser <br />answered he had not consulted the City Attorney on that point. Mr. Meisner added that councilors did have <br />the wisdom of commissions' prior positions on similar legislation, such as the Planning Commission's <br />position on Ballot Measure 37's predecessor, Measure 7. Since Measure 36 is a new issue, he said, the best <br />the CCIGR can do is decide whether it wants to make a recommendation to the City Council to take a <br />position on the ballot measure. He reminded the members that if the City Council does choose to take a <br />position on a ballot measure, City staff can not be involved at work in campaigning for or against the <br />measure. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly asked if City staff could be involved in the mechanical processing of legislative resolutions, such <br />as typing and recording. Mr. Heuser and Mr. Meisner confirmed that such "scrivener's work" was <br />permissible. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on August 31, 2004 Page 1 <br /> Intergovernmental Relations <br /> <br /> <br />