Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kelly asked staff to respond to the following questions when the council next considered the item: 1) <br />when could the City Council expect to see the context-sensitive street design standards to be added to the <br />Arterial and Collector Street Plan; 2) how the streets under consideration scored against the matrix; 3) why <br />Crest Drive and Storey Boulevard were being proposed for reclassification; and 4) a citation on why stop <br />signs would not change driver behavior. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 asked if traffic studies had been done for Garden Way following the improvements. Mr. <br />Schoening said no, as the improvements were only recently completed. Staff usually waited for a couple of <br />months to pass before doing such a study. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 suggested that the City produce design standards for the neighborhood in question and then the <br />council could address the trust issue by passing an ordinance specific to the area and referencing the <br />neighborhood association. He questioned if that would have an effect on financing. Mr. Schoening <br />questioned why the City would want to limit an ordinance to the area in question as there may other <br />neighborhoods where such an approach may be appropriate. Mr. Pap6 said that perhaps it would be the <br />start of a new paradigm for how the City addressed such issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 said that trust was achieved through consistency. He believed the council needed to proceed with <br />the caution. Although he did not think the council needed to amend the plan at this time, it needed to do so <br />at some time because the rest of the community was following the issue. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Taylor regarding the types of traffic calming that could be used on steep <br />collector streets, Mr. McNeel said the City could use speed tables in the form of raised intersections or <br />raised crosswalk and bulb-outs and chicanes to shift traffic horizontally. He said that the City would not be <br />able to use all the options contained in the Arterial and Collector Street Plan, such as diverters and speed <br />bumps, because it was unlikely they would be supported by the emergency services providers. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor suggested the council could shift the priority of any local street improvements in the area to <br />ensure that improvements were done earlier than otherwise. Mr. Schoening concurred. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor indicated her concurrence with the remarks of Mayor Torrey. <br /> <br />C. WORK SESSION: Information Technology Strategies and Issues <br /> <br />Information Services Director Randy Kolb provided a presentation on key strategies and issues related to <br />information technology at the City of Eugene. Among the key strategies that Mr. Kolb emphasized were the <br />City's information technology partnerships with other agencies, its investments in e-government, its <br />investments in automated business systems, document production and distribution services, the AIRS (Area <br />Information Records System) public safety and justice record system, and various projects funded by the <br />City's telecommunications tax. Mr. Kolb noted the challenges facing the division in the form of adequate <br />funding, the AIRS conversion to newer technology, the expanded access to data but increased risk created <br />by less secure wireless technologies, the potential of additional legal challenges to the City's telecommunica- <br />tions tax, and the anticipated Congressional review of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey solicited council comments and questions. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 25, 2004 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />