My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMinutes - 10/27/04 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2004
>
CCMinutes - 10/27/04 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:29:18 AM
Creation date
1/21/2005 3:00:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ing the named guiding principles referred to in the report accepted by the City Council on <br /> August 9, 2004. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for discussion on the amendment to the motion. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman reiterated that councilors interpreted the motion differently and she wanted to see the process, <br />timeline, and magnitude of the changes being considered before amendments to the code were proposed. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly was uncomfortable in accepting the staff-proposed motion because of the confusion it had caused. <br />He reiterated his early comments about staff's ability to move forward with the minor code amendments. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to table the item to the council meeting of <br /> January 5, 2005. The motion failed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Mr. Kelly, and Ms. Bettman voting <br /> yes. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor indicated she could not support the amended motion because of the confusion about its intent. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly believed that if the council passed the staff-proposed motion, it would only increase the level of <br />distrust between staff and the council. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said it was likely the motion would pass on a narrow majority. She said the council was <br />managing some very important issues, such as revising the Land Use Code and reconsideration of the <br />transportation system maintenance fee, on expedited, 5:3 votes. <br /> <br /> The amendment to the motion passed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Mr. Kelly, and Ms. Bettman voting <br /> <br /> no. <br /> <br /> The motion as amended passed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Mr. Kelly, and Ms. Bettman voting no. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ was comfortable leaving the issue up to staff. He encouraged councilors wishing to learn more <br />about the process to contact staff for more information. <br /> <br />In response to Mr. Papa's comment, Mr. Kelly said he ~just tried." He had tried in the meeting to get a <br />straight answer from staff about the scope of the code review, and he could not. He asked what planning <br />principles would be applied; he could not get a straight answer. No one was telling him what he was asking. <br />He questioned whether the council was going to govern in a vacuum, or if it was going to be able to talk <br />together. He termed the process dysfunctional. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said it was a functional process for a council majority but dysfunctional for the community. <br />Speaking to Mr. Papa's comment, she said she could certainly get a report on what the staff would do but <br />would have no influence on the process. When she gave the City Manager feedback, it ~pretty much falls on <br />deaf ears." She had no influence on City processes except through a vote on the council. She said in her <br />opinion, what Mr. Pap~ was proposing did not work. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said that the comments made by Ms. Bettman and Mr. Kelly were a tremendous disservice to <br />the administrators of the City. They paid attention to what each councilor said, and it was his opinion that <br />the council president had a substantial influence on what happened in the City's administrative offices. He <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 27, 2004 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.