Laserfiche WebLink
brought to help in the communication process. He hoped Mr. Handy would continue to be involved in the <br />neighborhood organization. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 said the City was about to commission an inventory on commercial and industrial <br />properties. He asked for information on whether there was a study being conducted on residential land to <br />determine whether the City was in compliance regarding such land supply. City Manager Taylor responded <br />that he would look into it. Councilor Pap6 thought it likely that the City would have to bring more <br />residential land into the UGB regardless of whether the land swap with the McDougal brothers was <br />conducted. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner also thanked Mr. Handy. He commented that relationship-building would be lengthy and <br />time-consuming in the River Road/Santa Clara area. He felt the real question regarding services was how <br />they would be delivered efficiently and effectively. He hoped the transition manager, David Reed, was able <br />to develop a good public process for more than conversation on these issues. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner asked for more information on what was being contemplated regarding the Low-Income <br />Housing Dispersal Policy. <br /> <br />Regarding concerns expressed about the MUPTE, Councilor Meisner stated that it was true that a property <br />tax exemption in a tax-base system produced a spread of that lost value to other taxpayers. He underscored <br />that tax bases were abolished for local jurisdictions by Ballot Measures 47 and 50. He stated that school <br />districts had permanent tax rates and if something was exempted it was simply lost revenue and was not <br />made up by other tax payers. He requested that the City Manager make available to the public some of the <br />memoranda to the council regarding the changes that those ballot measures put into effect at the local level. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly reminded the Santa Clara neighbors that a potential way to establish community parkland <br />was through outright acquisition rather than the land swap. He said the 1998 bond measure included money <br />to acquire 40 acres or more for a park in the Santa Clara area in order to provide equity with other areas of <br />the City. He expressed discomfort at some of the feedback he had received that suggested, for instance, that <br />the eight acres at the Santa Clara Elementary School might be an adequate park. He worried about losing <br />the opportunity for park land on the usual scale of a community park. He added that funding for <br />development of a park or aquatic facility was not available at present. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman wished to clarify that $10.5 million had been taken from the telecommunications fund <br />and $5 million from right-of-way fees and placed in the City's reserve. She underscored that this was a part <br />of the $28.2 million and was not in addition. She stated that this money had not previously been accounted <br />for in any fund because some of it was still in litigation. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey noted that he had asked earlier in the year for the City Manager to develop an outreach <br />process with the people of Santa Clara in order to determine what they wanted in a park. He understood <br />that this process was underway. <br /> <br />2. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br /> A. Approval of City Council Minutes <br /> - October 20, 2004, Work Session <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 22, 2004 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />