Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br />History of Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Rate Setting in Eugene <br /> <br />1980 <br />An ordinance was adopted changing the rate setting from resolution to ordinance. <br /> <br />1989 <br /> City Council adopted an ordinance that changed rate setting from ordinance to administrative rule, establishing <br />minimum-maximum rates; set rates to encourage recycling and implementing a $1.50 recycling rebate in <br />residential rates to customers who recycled; and limited the number of licenses to those active on January 1, 1989. <br /> <br />1991 <br /> Staff conducted a cost of service study. One outcome of the study was a separate rate structure for commercial <br />service and for residential service, both of which were based on cost by service category. Rates based on cost by <br />service category result in a higher rate-per-pound for low volume service than for high volume service. <br /> <br />1992 <br />As recommended by the Solid Waste and Recycling Board, City Council adopted a policy to implement <br />progressive residential collection rates to comply with the 1991 Oregon Recycling Act. <br /> <br />1994 <br /> For the commercial sector, results of the 1994 study suggested hauler profits exceeded the range recommended by <br />the Collection Rates Committee. As recommended by the Committee, the City Manager addressed this issue by <br />holding commercial rates constant while increasing the commercial license fee and implementing a commercial <br />recycling requirement. <br /> <br />1996 <br />In response to a request for a rate increase by three residential haulers, staff conducted a rate review. Residential <br />rates were increased. <br /> <br />1998 <br />An independent consultant was engaged to assist with a solid waste and recycling rate study. In addition, a staff <br />advisory committee (Rates Advisory Committee) was formed to provide feedback to staff on methodology and <br />policy assumptions. As a result of the 1998 rate analysis, future analyses set the rates based on the largest hauler, <br />haulers provide data in a reporting mechanism that standardizes the information, the target rate of return was set at <br />11 percent, and staff examined the possibility of implementing collection districts as a strategy to contain rates. <br /> <br />2000 <br /> The driving force of the 2000 residential rate review recommendation was the movement of customers to smaller <br />containers. Implementation of yard debris service was set for September 2000. No change in commercial rates. <br /> <br />2001 <br /> Residential and commercial rates were to be combined for purposes of rate calculation. There was an <br />understanding that residential rates would not be raised for at least the next review period. <br /> <br />2002 <br /> While recommending maintaining residential rates at their current level, commercial rates were reformatted to <br />provide progressivity based on volume and frequency and increased to provide the 11 percent profit calculated on <br />the entire customer base. This increase went into effect July 1, 2003. <br /> <br />2004 <br />There was no need for a rate increase in 2004. The rate stabilization is a result of Council direction in 2001 to <br />combine residential and commercial expenses for the purposes of rate calculation. <br /> <br />2006 <br /> No adjustment was made to the collection rates as a result of the 2006 rate analysis. The decision was made to <br />conduct another rate analysis in 2007 and use a three year projection factor in determining rates. <br /> <br />2007 <br />Due to a $20 per ton disposal fee increase by the Lane County Board of Commissioners that will be effective on <br />September 1, 2007, an increase to City rates will be implemented to cover that cost. The analysis for the <br />collection portion of the rate is ready for implementation under existing rules. <br /> <br /> <br />