My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 4 - Ordinance on Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 08/13/07 Meeting
>
Item 4 - Ordinance on Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:09:57 PM
Creation date
8/10/2007 11:01:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Maximum indebtedness is not a project budget. It also does not obligate the Agency to spend a <br />particular amount of money on any specific project. <br />The City/URA’s direct costs for the West Broadway redevelopment concept, based on prelim- <br />inary information from the developers, are estimated at $25.6 million. The overall total esti- <br />mated cost to the City/URA is listed in the table above as $43.8 million, which includes two non- <br />traditional cost categories. First, interest on borrowing is included in the chart because the <br />City/URA will need to borrow money to pay some of the project costs and some people have <br />asked for an estimate of the interest payments on the borrowing. It is not typical, however, to <br />include interest in the cost of purchasing an asset. For example, when a person buys a $200,000 <br />house and takes out a mortgage, they do not say the cost of their house is really $400,000 <br />because of the interest that will be paid over time. <br />Second, tax exemptions are shown in the column for total City/URA costs. The project might be <br />eligible for tax exemptions related to low income housing and downtown multi-unit housing. <br />The exemptions are not direct checks written by the City to the developers, but rather are <br />foregone tax revenues for a period of time. Similarly, tax exemptions are not typically included <br />in the stated cost of a development project. It should also be emphasized that if a West <br />Broadway redevelopment project does not go forward, or if the project does not apply for or <br />qualify for the tax exemptions, the amounts listed here under tax exemptions are not available for <br />spending on other redevelopment projects. <br />The table also shows that maximum indebtedness includes a provision for district administration <br />costs from now until the year 2030. District administration includes staff to undertake the annual <br />tasks needed to run the district, such as developing and monitoring a budget, reporting financial <br />results, and preparing required reports. District staff also works with downtown property owners <br />on a variety of issues, and administers the Downtown Revitalization Loan Program. These <br />administrative costs are not directly related to a West Broadway redevelopment project. <br />The West Broadway redevelopment project is in a conceptual stage, and there are a number of <br />factors that could change the cost of the project, as well as change the City/URA’s participation <br />in the project. Some of those factors are: <br />Because the project has not yet been designed and is still in the conceptual stage, addi- <br />tional refinement of the project details could result in a different cost for the project. <br />Depending on the specific properties to be acquired and the timing of the purchase option <br />agreements, the overall cost for property acquisition could increase as the need for <br />renewed options arises. <br />Construction costs could also increase due to the level of inflation, interest rates and <br />property conditions. <br />The West Broadway Advisory Committee has been appointed to work with a consultant <br />and the developers to refine the scope of the project, including items such as public open <br />spaces. If the Committee recommends including public amenities that were not envi- <br />sioned by the developers in their concepts, the result could be higher construction costs <br />and potentially higher costs to the City/URA for the public share of the project costs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.