My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 4 - Ordinance on Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 08/13/07 Meeting
>
Item 4 - Ordinance on Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:09:57 PM
Creation date
8/10/2007 11:01:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The estimated amount of urban renewal taxes to be divided over the remaining term of the <br />Renewal Plan (net of discounts, delinquents, etc.) is shown in Table 7. Only the perm- <br />anent tax rates of the overlapping jurisdictions are considered in this analysis because <br />there are no local option levies included in urban renewal revenues for the Downtown <br />Urban Renewal District, and bonded debt tax rates will be reduced from year to year until <br />the existing bonds are paid off. <br />As can be seen, in FY2007/2008, it is estimated that the City of Eugene would forego <br />about $840,000 of revenue because of the Downtown Urban Renewal District. In <br />FY2029/2030, when the district is terminated, the City of Eugene is estimated to receive <br />$2.2 million of additional tax revenue. Lane County is estimated to forego $150,000 of <br />revenue in the first fiscal year, and to benefit by $400,000 of additional tax revenue when <br />the district is terminated in FY2029/2030. The combined school districts are estimated to <br />forego $670,000 of revenue in the first fiscal year, and to benefit by $1.8 million of addi- <br />tional tax revenue when the district is terminated in FY2029/2030. As mentioned above, <br />however, the impact on schools is really an impact on the state’s budget because schools <br />are mainly funded on a per-pupil funding formula rather than by the level of property tax <br />dollars generated within their boundaries. This analysis does not take into account the <br />effect of terminating the urban renewal district on any local option levy that the schools <br />might have outstanding in FY2029/2030. <br />Because the Downtown District Urban Renewal Plan took steps to be “grandfathered” <br />under the provisions of Measure 50, the district is allowed to levy a higher amount of taxes <br />than would otherwise be allowed for the existing life of the district. The base amount <br />allowed to be levied is the “division of tax” levy, which is equal to the incremental property <br />value in the district times the overlapping tax rate for all jurisdictions (City, County, schools, <br />bonds). In addition, the “grandfather” provision allows the Downtown District Urban <br />Renewal District to levy a “special levy” in order to protect the level of property tax collec- <br />tions after implementation of the provisions of Measure 50. In FY2006/2007, the special <br />levy tax rate was $0.1888/$1000 of AV and the “division of tax” levy was $0.1936, for a <br />total of $0.3824/$1000 of AV. When the district has collected sufficient revenues to fund <br />the current $33 million of projects included under the existing maximum indebtedness cap, <br />the district will no longer qualify for the special levy and taxes will go down for Eugene <br />taxpayers which is anticipated to occur not later than FY2008/2009. <br />Table 7 on the following page provides details of the impact of carrying out the 2007 <br />Amendment to the Plan. <br />Report on the Downtown Urban Renewal District Plan – Circulation Draft of July 17, 2007 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.