Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilor Bettman explained that she had pulled the May 14 minutes in order to gain clarification about a <br />portion of the document. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of the min- <br />utes from the May 14, 2007, work session passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> <br />3. ACTION: <br /> <br />An Ordinance Concerning Manufactured Dwelling Park Closures; and Amending Sections 2.1060 <br />and 2.1086 of the Eugene Code, 1971 <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved that the City Council adopt Council <br />Bill 4948, an ordinance concerning manufactured dwelling park closures. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend the title and the pro- <br />posed ordinance to add a new section 2.1088 to the Eugene Code, 1971, to read: <br />“No manufactured dwelling park owner may refuse tenancy on the basis of a manu- <br />factured dwelling’s age or size if the same size or similar age as the prospective ten- <br />ant’s dwelling. Manufactured dwellings are of similar age if they are constructed <br />within 10 years of each other.” <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said she considered a prohibition on older homes to be a form of discrimination and not a <br />quality issue. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon stated that she had served on the committee that reviewed the issue and helped to <br />prepare the proposed ordinance language. She said the motion was not part of the recommendation and she <br />believed the amendment would be detrimental to it. She felt some of the unintended consequences of the <br />amendment could be that park owners could choose not to renew leases at all rather than be forced to accept <br />something that could compromise the quality of the park. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Ortiz, Councilor Solomon affirmed that there were manufactured <br />home owners serving on the committee. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz noted that manufactured home parks were located in both her ward and in Councilor <br />Solomon’s ward. She acknowledged that some of her constituents were concerned about whether they would <br />continue to have the ability to stay in their homes. She said she would not support the amendment. She <br />believed that there was good representation in crafting the proposed ordinance by mobile home residents and <br />that there had been a lot of work done on the ordinance already. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the amendment failed, 5:2; councilors Bettman and Taylor voting in favor. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy related that a request had been made regarding an amendment to allow appeals to go before <br />the City Council. She said the ordinance included the option for an appeal to the Hearings Official. She <br />reported that the City Attorney had advised against such an amendment as it would create a potential for a <br />standard of deviations among similarly situated persons. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon recalled testimony given by Troy Brooks, owner of Songbrook Manufactured Housing <br />Park, at the public hearing regarding the mobile home park that used to be located by the Ferry Street <br />Bridge. He had pointed out that the mobile home park was now gone and a large hotel stood in its place, <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 9, 2007 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />