My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Ordinance Concerning Initiative and Referendum Procedures
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 09/10/07 Meeting
>
Item 5: Ordinance Concerning Initiative and Referendum Procedures
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:52:01 PM
Creation date
9/6/2007 11:28:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Public Hearing: An Ordinance Concerning Initiative and Referendum Procedures; and <br />Amending Sections 2.972 and 2.981 of the Eugene Code, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: September 10, 2007 Agenda Item Number: 5 <br />Department: City Attorney Staff Contact: Glenn Klein <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-5080 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />The purpose of this public hearing is to consider an ordinance amending Section 2.972 of the Eugene <br />Code, 1971 (“EC”) to clarify the number of signatures required to place an initiative or referendum <br />petition on the ballot; and amending EC 2.981(2)(b) to authorize the council to refer measures to a later <br />election date as well as an earlier date. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />In determining the number of signatures required to place an initiative or referendum petition on the <br />ballot, the City has historically interpreted the phrase “the number of votes cast for all candidates for <br />mayor” in EC 2.972 to include write-in votes. The Lane County Circuit Court recently declared that <br />individuals receiving write-in votes do not quality as “candidates,” under EC 2.972, and therefore, the <br />City Recorder cannot include write-in votes in her calculation of the requisite number of signatures. <br /> <br />The proposed amendment amends EC 2.972 by substituting the phrase “the office of” for the phrase “all <br />candidates for,” to clarify that in computing the number of signatures required, all votes cast for the <br />office of mayor, including write-in votes, will be counted. <br /> <br />EC 2.981(2)(b) currently requires that an election on legislation referred to the voters of the City by a <br />th <br />referendum petition generally shall be held on the next available election date (not sooner than the 90 <br />day after certification and acceptance of the petition). That date could be a special election with nothing <br />else on the ballot, which would mean that the City would bear the full cost of the election. The proposed <br />amendment would allow the Council the option of referring the measure to a later election date <br />(presumably when the cost to the City would be less due to other measures also being on the ballot). <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Not applicable. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />None; this is a public hearing only. Action is tentatively scheduled for September 24, 2007. <br /> <br /> F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M070910\S0709105.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.