My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Street Design Standards for the Crest Drive Neighborhood
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 09/19/07 Work Session
>
Item B: Street Design Standards for the Crest Drive Neighborhood
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:16:37 PM
Creation date
9/13/2007 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/19/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Context Sensitive Solutions Process History <br />After several months of work, the members of the Crest Drive Community Team (CDCT) approved <br />their group operating agreements for the CSS process for the Crest Drive neighborhood. There are 21 <br />members of the CDCT including two City staff: Lisa Gardner, Planning Director and Mark Schoening, <br />City Engineer. The CDCT developed group agreements addressing decision-making, meetings, <br />communication and support. Each member of the CDCT signed the group agreements. The CDCT also <br />developed a mission statement that reads: <br /> <br />To recommend a street design for the identified sections of Crest Drive, Storey Boulevard, and <br />Friendly Street using the context sensitive solutions process while taking into consideration the <br />entire neighborhood context. <br /> <br />To support the design efforts of the CDCT the City conducted a topographic survey of all of the streets <br />under consideration, including all of the trees within the public right-of-way. The City’s survey crew <br />surveyed 15,846 data points including the existing edge of pavement, property corners, public and <br />private utilities, structures, and trees. All of this survey information was used to generate a set of maps <br />to aid in the street design process. The maps also included information on the existing pavement width <br />which is shown on Attachment B. <br /> <br />The design process involved City staff working with five separate street teams on five separate street <br />segments – Upper Crest, Middle Crest, Lower Crest, Storey and Friendly. Each street team presented its <br />conceptual design to the entire CDCT. As part of the design process, each street team evaluated its <br />design using the Themes and Values (Attachment C) developed and approved by the CDCT. <br /> <br />Over the course of two CDCT meetings on June 28 and July 12, the CDCT reached consensus on the <br />conceptual design for all five street segments. However, the CDCT did not reach agreement on the <br />overall design concept because of an outstanding issue regarding the minimum street width. Through a <br />consensus-based decision process, the CDCT has determined that there are compelling reasons to <br />support a minimum street width of 18 feet (two nine-foot travel lanes.) Reasons supporting the <br />recommendation include the CDCT’s themes and values regarding preserved neighborhood livability, <br />reduction of traffic speeds, efficient use of urban land in a rural setting, increased safety for all modes of <br />use, and focus on a footprint that fits the neighborhood's character. As such, an 18-foot street width is <br />. <br />perceived to be more consistent with the CDCT's adopted themes and values than a 20-foot street width <br />Based on these collaboratively developed values, it is the consensus recommendation of the CDCT to <br />pursue a legislative change to the minimum street width (18 feet rather than the prescribed minimum of <br />20 feet) prior to making a decision on the overall design concept <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Transplan Goal #2: Transportation System Characteristics <br /> <br />Enhance the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area’s quality of life and economic opportunity by <br />providing a transportation system that is: <br /> <br />a.Balanced <br /> <br />b.Accessible <br /> <br />c.Efficient <br /> <br />d.Safe <br /> L:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M070919\S070919B.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.