Laserfiche WebLink
should be taken off the table; the advisory committee should examine that issue and she hoped it would be a <br />high priority. Ms. Jones said that was an available option and it would be up to the committee to provide its <br />advice on that matter. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman expressed alarm about the cooperation between KWG and Beam and asked what would <br />happen if Beam dropped out because the conditions proposed by KWG were untenable. Mr. Braud said in <br />that circumstance the council would need to revisit its decisions. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka stated he was committed to an open and transparent public process on West Broadway <br />redevelopment, including holding whatever public hearings were necessary to ensure the community was <br />fully informed. He said that was the purpose of the previous public hearings and the advisory committee. <br />He disagreed with Ms. Bettman regarding the council’s commitment to hold businesses harmless and <br />clarified that the motion directed the committee to create a transition plan so the council could consider <br />transition and relocation options and not leave the obligation entirely in the hands of developers. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to direct the agency director to enter into non- <br />binding MOUs with Beam and KWG for the redevelopment of West Broadway, consistent <br />with the draft MOUs included in attachments B and C and that if there are any material <br />changes to attachments B and C that the agency director bring back those material changes <br />for agency review and approval. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to separate the motion and vote on the two <br />MOUs separately. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she intended to vote for the Beam MOU, but not the KWG MOU and it was only fair that <br />councilors be given a chance to vote separately on the MOUs. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark noted that the council had already selected both developers so moving ahead with both MOUs <br />would seem prudent. <br /> <br />The vote to separate was a tie, 4:4; Ms. Taylor, Ms. Bettman, Mr. Zelenka and Ms. Ortiz <br />voting in favor, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Clark, Mr. Poling and Ms. Solomon voting in opposition. <br />Mayor Piercy broke the tie by voting n favor and the motion passed, 5:4. <br />i <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz restated her motion as: “Move to direct the agency director to enter into a non- <br />binding MOU with Beam for the redevelopment of West Broadway, consistent with the <br />draft MOU included in attachment B and that if there are any material changes to attach- <br />ment B that the agency director bring back those material changes for agency review and <br />approval.” <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if the motion included her suggestion for a friendly amendment regarding low-income <br />housing. Ms. Ortiz replied that she assumed that was a “given.” <br /> <br />The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to direct the agency director to enter into a non- <br />binding MOU with KWG for the redevelopment of West Broadway, consistent with the <br />draft MOU included in attachment C and that if there are any material changes to attach- <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 18, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />