Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Zelenka said he hoped the message to voters was that they were being asked to vote on one piece of a <br />larger funding package. He said it was important for the public to understand that most Oregon cities were <br />facing a road fund deficit and local jurisdictions would need to develop their own solutions. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark expressed concern that referring the funding package components separately to the voters would <br />result in people thinking that the initial component had fixed the problem and rejecting subsequent measures. <br />He liked the concept of repealing the $.03 increase if a countywide tax was passed as a way to guarantee to <br />the public that the council was not looking at a number of ways to increase taxes. He had heard that the gas <br />dealers association and the Chamber of Commerce were in favor of a countywide gas tax. He said that <br />Representative Nancy Nathanson raised the potential of a metropolitan area-only gas tax, perhaps bounded <br />by schools districts and eliminating the rural areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling commented that even though the State doubled registration fees, Oregon was still 45th in the <br />nation in terms of its fees. He suggested that the County could be asked to calculate what revenues could be <br />generated from various levels of a countywide registration fee. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said the County was reluctant to enact a funding mechanism after its recent experiences with <br />the voters. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she would not support including caveats in the ballot measure. She said there was no <br />assurance that funds raised by the County would be dedicated to maintenance and preservation and she knew <br />the County preferred to use the funds for other purposes, such as new roads. She said it was unknown what <br />the County would establish as a tax rate and how that would be distributed to cities and, therefore, she was <br />uncertain if Eugene would receive enough to be held harmless. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein said he was not certain what the term "hold harmless" meant in terms of including that reference <br />in the $.03 gas tax ballot measure. He could attempt to include ballot measure language that would <br />indicated if the County enacted a $.03 tax that applied to the City of Eugene, the City would get all of that <br />revenue generated from gas stations within Eugene. He pointed out that the council already had the <br />authority to change the $.03 tax, whether enacted by the voters or the council, and that was the simplest <br />approach instead of trying to craft ordinance language to reflect those provisions. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to extend the discussion by 10 minutes. The mo- <br />tion to extend passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein determined there were no objections to taking action on the ordinance the following week. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Kurt Corey reminded the council that the short amount of time before a November <br />election meant the council and mayor would need to be active participants in advocating for passage of a <br />ballot measure. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka asked if ballot measure language could indicate that the City's tax would be reduced propor- <br />tionately if the County enacted a tax at a certain level. Mr. Klein said he would attempt to do so. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said the transportation subcommittee directed staff to discuss other funding options with the <br />County and other jurisdictions, including a vehicle registration fee and rental car fee. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council August 8, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />