My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 09/24/07 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:25:11 PM
Creation date
9/20/2007 3:05:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
projects could be done without amending the plan. She noted that Thomas Kemper had spoken before the <br />City Club and suggested that copies of the recording be provided to her colleagues. She asserted that he <br />could not answer specific questions about the project. She reiterated her feeling that people would not be <br />able to testify about a spending limit increase without knowing the details of the project. She noted that Mr. <br />Kemper indicated that collaborating with Beam Development would decrease the housing units projected to <br />be built by almost half. She asserted that Eugene may end up with as many housing units or “only slightly <br />more” than it would have had if it went with the “original Sears pit site.” <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka agreed that the processes were arcane and difficult to follow. He said in retrospect the <br />processes were not designed well. He hoped that staff would work with people to directly contact them in <br />order to provide the information needed, given the short timeline. He wished to clarify that the housing <br />project across from the library was being rolled into the larger project. He noted that Mr. Kemper was <br />planning on 80 to 100 affordable housing units and that while KWG Development Partners would drop <br />some housing units, Beam Development indicated it would add some. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark thanked staff for all of the hard work that went into the project. He also thanked all the <br />people who spoke at the public hearing. He thanked Mr. Nicholson for his former service to the City, Mr. <br />Handy for investing his time in the WBAC, and Mr. Monk for the work he did trying to make the City <br />better. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark said he heard from several people that without a plan the City had the “cart before the <br />horse.” He understood that this was an opportunity for the City to have a process whereby it could have a <br />meaningful discussion about aspects of it in order to create a plan that had more broad support. He felt <br />there were a lot of good public processes. He quipped that Eugene had “elevated public process to a full- <br />contact spectator sport.” He enjoyed that the citizens of Eugene had this level of civic passion. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark observed that it seemed some were speaking of the money as though it were money that the <br />City could or would spend in another fashion on a higher priority. He commented that if urban renewal <br />money was allowed to be spent on street repair it would be something he could appreciate, but he acknowl- <br />edged that urban renewal moneys borrow against the potential future increase in the value of the properties <br />that the City was “dealing with.” He said without the project, the values were not there and there was no <br />actual money. He underscored that it was not as though General Fund dollars were being spent that might <br />be spent on something else instead. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor said she attended the City Club at which Mr. Kemper had spoken. She shared that she <br />had been alarmed to hear him say the development would be “up-scale” and that existing businesses would <br />have to relocate. She asserted that he referred to “the right kind of tenants.” She felt this did not mean <br />every kind of tenant. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor said the situation had gotten scary as the council had moved past a point at which it had <br />become too late. She opined that it now seemed the City could not get out of the situation, that it was a <br />“done deal.” She recalled that she had initially hoped that the City would only work with Beam Develop- <br />th <br />ment for the larger development and with KWG Partners to develop the Charnelton/10 Avenue site. She <br />asserted that the City could have had housing units built at the latter site by now had the larger development <br />not “waylaid” it. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka said he had made the motion to form the WBAC in order to garner more public <br />involvement. He reiterated that all of the activities related to the urban renewal plan amendments were at the <br />direction of the City Council. He stressed that the council asked staff to bring back all of the pieces that <br />would put the council in the position where it could “say yes.” He urged anyone who wanted to get involved <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 16, 2007 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.