Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Taylor suggested that the motion say that the passes would be provided if needed. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor pointed out that the motion was not a request from the Eugene Celebration; rather it <br />had been requested by the downtown merchants. He thought a motion that went forward with free bus <br />passes would be closer to the goals of sustainability the City was embracing. He felt the parking spaces <br />would be taken up by the booth vendors in the downtown area first. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon opposed providing free parking, but she found the idea of providing LTD bus passes <br />compelling. She was uncertain how to vote on it without knowing what LTD intended to do and what it had <br />done in the past. She recommended that the amendment be deferred until this information was available. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor concurred. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz withdrew her motion pending further information. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy ascertained that there was no objection to withdrawal of the motion. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon said if it was determined that the City would pay for bus passes as well as provide free <br />parking she would expect the cost not to exceed $9,000, as previously stated. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy thought the City should do what it could to encourage people to walk, ride bicycles, and take <br />the bus to the Eugene Celebration given that this year’s theme was sustainability. She said one possibility <br />would be to consider not ticketing people for parking violations during the Celebration as this would be more <br />“friendly.” <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor noted that there were people who did not live close to a transit stop. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor indicated that staff would summarize the discussion and determine what the costs <br />would be and what LTD intended to do. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor recalled that the council adopted the Fairmount/University of Oregon Special Area <br />Study several years earlier. He said Transportation Planning Manager for the Engineering Division, Rob <br />Inerfeld, would present one of the outcomes of the study, which was how to address traffic that cuts through <br />the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Inerfeld reviewed the previous council direction on the issue. He provided a summary of the transporta- <br />tion studies that had been completed and reviewed the public participation that had taken place, as outlined <br />in the Agenda Item Summary (AIS) on the topic. He provided an overview of the proposed plan as agreed <br />upon by the Fairmount Neighbors Traffic Calming Committee and the University of Oregon. He asked for <br />council direction as to whether staff should proceed with the proposal. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman favored traffic calming. She asked if the University had offered to contribute to any of the <br />proposed capital improvements. Mr. Inerfeld replied that the University offered to contribute to the potential <br />enhancements to the traffic calming devices on the streets that went through the campus area. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 9, 2007 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />