My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 10/08/07 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:28:12 PM
Creation date
10/5/2007 11:03:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/8/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tions, which had to reinvent themselves over and over again. She said that cultural attractions were <br />important to the economic vitality of the community and downtown. <br /> <br />Speaking to financing, Ms. Bettman said that that City proposed to place $50 million on the table to <br />subsidize retailers downtown without looking at the range of options that existed for how to best leverage <br />that money and do the necessary economic impact studies and give the public the best value for the money. <br />She believed that the implementation of the report should be funded through urban renewal money. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka commended the committee, the consultants, and staff for producing a realistic and doable plan. <br />He found the arts to be a high priority, and a city that lacked arts and culture was not a city in which he <br />wanted to live. Speaking to the issue of funding, Mr. Zelenka suggested the City faced a continual <br />balancing act in what it wanted to fund, and he thought that to be a thriving city to attract people in a new <br />economy, such investments were needed. People would be more mobile and transient in the future and <br />would be attracted to places with a strong cultural presence. <br /> <br />Referring to Strategy I.1, related to the formation of the proposed alliance, Mr. Zelenka asked how the <br />alliance would be formed and what the City was paying for. Ms. Niles said that staff envisioned that an <br />implementation team would be formed to ensure the plan did not sit on a shelf. The team would provide a <br />foundation to get the alliance going. She said the money would provide staff resources, materials, and <br />supplies to the committee to ensure it had a good foundation. The department would look to its internal <br />resources to the degree possible, but she acknowledged some gaps in existing funding. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka asked what the Hult Center operational examination would encompass. Ms. Niles anticipated a <br />consultant would be hired to examine operations, gaps in services, data collection, and the financial <br />operations of the center. That might lead to a change in the center’s mission. At this time, the mission of <br />the Hult Center was to serve the broadest community. If a consultant recommended changes to the City’s <br />operations or financial model, that would be included in the report. The last study completed was not so in- <br />depth and had not addressed the Hult Center’s future bottom line. <br /> <br />Referring to Strategy V.3, related to a coordinator to put together an arts plan, Mr. Zelenka suggested that <br />was a function of the proposed alliance. Ms. Niles said a Public Art Committee had been formed at City <br />Manager Taylor’s behest, and it advised the City on its implementation of the public arts ordinance. The <br />establishment of a public arts coordinator was a lower priority item that had been implemented as a result of <br />the committee’s formation, and the coordinator would staff that committee and be a permanent staff <br />member. Ms. Bach said a public arts plan would provide guidance to the committee as it implemented the <br />ordinance in a more targeted manner that was dovetailed with other community priorities. City Manager <br />Taylor added that the quality and maintenance of the art as well as the space for the art were all committee <br />topics. The City had a long tradition of allocating money for public art but it had not always placed its arts <br />expenditures in a larger framework. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka asked if the West Broadway Advisory Committee had discussed how its work might impact the <br />provision of public art downtown. City Manager Taylor suggested that staff and the arts committee could <br />work in the same time frame as the West Broadway Advisory Committee to make recommendations for <br />public art in association with the West Broadway redevelopment project. Acting Library, Recreation, and <br />Cultural Services Director Renee Grube concurred with City Manager Taylor and indicated that staff would <br />have more information when it had more clarity about the budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka suggested that the West Broadway Advisory Committee could add on to its charge regarding <br />the open spaces to discuss public space. Mayor Piercy agreed. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 25, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.