Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dan Neal of Steelhead Townhouses is a single-site property developer who is employed as an attorney <br />? <br /> <br />and professional musician. His law office has been at 1361 Pearl, in the West University <br />th <br />Neighborhood, for 27 years. His Coho Townhouse project on West 14 received a MUPTE and is <br />under construction. Steelhead is scheduled for City Council consideration on November 13, 2007. <br /> <br />Martin Henner is an attorney, mediator and long time Eugene resident. With the exception of one <br />? <br /> <br />historic apartment rehabilitation experience in Cottage Grove seven years ago, Eugene Co-housing is <br />his first real estate development and involves bringing a variety of potential homeowners together to <br />live in the core area. This is scheduled for council consideration on November 13, 2007. <br /> <br />Local Market Conditions and Activity <br />The local rental housing market is tight. The low vacancy rate (under two percent in Eugene and near <br />zero percent in the core area) has shown a tendency to increase rents at rates in excess of wage growth. <br />Yet, because of increases in land and construction costs, local rental rates still appear to be insufficient to <br />support new construction of quality infill rental housing. In an effort to understand this dynamic, staff <br />solicited input from a local commercial appraiser, Corey Dingman of Duncan and Brown Inc. <br />(Attachment F). MUPTE was highlighted in this discussion as a tool to bridge the feasibility gap <br />particularly in regard to redevelopment projects at infill sites. <br /> <br />Recently, staff mapped new, citywide, multi-family housing developments of five units or more <br />(Attachment C). Based on available data, 1,332 units received permits during the last three years. <br />MUPTE assistance represents seven percent of the total and three percent of the total of infill rentals. The <br />47 units at The Tate are infill condominiums. The remaining 86 percent are comprised of large-scale <br />projects developed by out-of-area developers on vacant land (benefiting from economy of scale), senior <br />assisted housing (Cascade Manor is connected to an assisted living development), condominiums, and <br />heavily subsidized low-income housing. <br /> <br /> MUPTE rental assistance 45 units <br /> Infill rentals without MUPTE 153 units <br /> Condominiums 221 units <br /> (Includes The Tate (47 units), which received MUPTE assistance) <br /> Large scale projects 392 units <br /> Subsidized low-income housing 471 units <br /> Senior housing, undeveloped land 50 units <br />Total 1,332 <br /> <br /> <br />MUPTE Project Feasibility and Cost Reasonableness <br />MUPTE is intended to influence feasibility, location and quality. Location and quality are addressed by <br />the MUPTE boundaries and the quality standards in the application. In terms of feasibility, City staff <br />review the pro-forma for each MUPTE application. The applicant must demonstrate in their financial <br />presentation why the project could not be built “but for” the exemption. Staff is familiar with the <br />construction costs of new multi-family housing because the City closely monitors the financial details of <br />low-income housing development. At any given time, there are typically one or two low-income <br />developments under construction and others in the pipeline. In a similar role, private lenders closely look <br />at a project pro-forma, carefully examine the cash-flow, and determine cost reasonableness and feasibility <br />before approving the project financing. In virtually every approved MUPTE project, the private lender <br />required documentation of the MUPTE approval as a condition of their approval of project financing. <br /> F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M071022\S071022C.doc <br /> <br /> <br />