My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B1: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 11/13/07 Work Session
>
Item B1: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:17:37 PM
Creation date
11/9/2007 9:54:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
come and make the request and accept responsibility for anything that might go wrong. He suggested that <br />the University student leadership be consulted and recommended that in fairness the decision should wait <br /> <br />until students were back on campus. <br /> <br />David Sonnichsen <br />, 2435 Skyline Boulevard, understood why the ordinance might be seen as expedient but <br />he felt it was bad public policy. He had monitored the effect of games on park land and he felt that incidents <br />of alcohol abuse had increased. He found it incongruous that football players were not allowed to drink but <br />the followers of the games thought it was a part of the process. He wondered if fewer people would attend <br />the games if they had to adhere to the same rules as the football players. He added that he thought it was <br />crazy to allow people to remain and drink after games for two more hours before driving. He urged the <br />council to oppose the ordinance. <br /> <br />rd <br />Bob Dougherty <br />, 479 East 53 Avenue, supported the council’s endeavor to clean up the Autzen Stadium <br />parking system. He noted that he also was a member of the Masonic Lodge. He said for the past two years <br />the lodge provided an alcohol consumption policy handout to every car that came into the parking lot. He <br />related that the lodge required that each carload of people appoint a designated driver. He underscored that <br />many people came to the lot who did not drink but would have a hot dog and chips and that sort of thing. <br />He believed the alcohol consumption was reasonably limited. He stated that the lodge provided security <br />throughout the lot and they coached the people who needed coaching. He acknowledged the opposing view <br />but he thought customers in the lodge lot should be able to have an equal access to the stadium lot <br />experience. <br /> <br />Dan Williams <br />, 3544 Black Oak Drive, represented the University of Oregon. He stated that the University <br />actively participated for over a year in meetings with a number of people who were concerned with these <br />issues. He felt the meetings had been helpful. He stressed that the University went to extensive lengths to <br />make sure the tailgating was lawful. He conveyed the University’s support for the proposal, including the <br />suggested amendment to reduce the impacted area. He stated that the University was willing to work to <br />make the ordinance successful. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing and called for council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman thanked everyone who testified. She cited a section of the ordinance that stated that <br />“disorderly conduct will not be tolerated.” She asked if the City had that kind of language in any other <br />ordinance. City Attorney Jerome replied that she was not aware of such language in other ordinances. <br />Councilor Bettman asked what it meant. Ms. Jerome replied that the ordinance would require a handbill and <br />signage indicating the parameters for behavior. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said she would pose a substitute motion that would create equity for football games by <br />eliminating the exemption for Autzen Stadium. She felt it was in the public’s best interest to regulate <br />drinking. She averred that the City should uphold its law regardless of an entity’s financial position. She <br />believed that the exemption was inequitable because the City did not allow public drinking for any of the <br />other venues in the City. She believed that to entertain adopting the ordinance meant that people would have <br />to suspend their beliefs given that it was not a hypothetical issue that drinking and driving led to tragedy. <br />She asserted that to think that people would drink more responsibly around a football game was “pretend- <br />ing.” <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka thought Councilor Bettman raised a point regarding the other venues in Eugene for public <br />events, which were required to obtain a license from OLCC. He asked what the OLCC requirements were <br />and what it would take for all of the people who coordinated tailgating activities to acquire such a license. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 10, 2007 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.