Laserfiche WebLink
to suspend their beliefs given that it was not a hypothetical issue that drinking and driving led to tragedy. <br />She asserted that to think that people would drink more responsibly around a football game was “pretend- <br />ing.” <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka thought Councilor Bettman raised a point regarding the other venues in Eugene for public <br />events, which were required to obtain a license from OLCC. He asked what the OLCC requirements were <br />and what it would take for all of the people who coordinated tailgating activities to acquire such a license. <br />He wondered what the people who supervised the parking lots in which the activities occurred would have to <br />do differently under an OLCC license than under the ordinance. He also wished to know what role OLCC <br />played on game days in that area and what the difference in the liability that someone would have versus <br />someone who had an OLCC license. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka disagreed with the assertion that the ordinance would increase public drinking as he <br />believed it already existed. He felt the question lay in whether the City should acknowledge and regulate it <br />given limited police resources. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka wanted to know if the ordinance could be limited to non-profit agencies. He requested <br />statistics on the drunken driving arrests on game days versus regular Saturdays. He added his feeling that <br />two hours of drinking after the game was likely too long. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman commented that people could show up four hours prior to the game and drink. She felt <br />that once the exemption was granted the capacity to regulate the drinking was reduced. She reiterated her <br />opposition to the ordinance, adding that if the area around Autzen Stadium was made to be consistent with <br />the rest of the City it would make enforcement simpler. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 10, 2007 Page 9 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />