Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />direction, staff will bring information back to council, in order to weigh the policy value against the <br />administrative cost. In this early stage of fee development, precise trade offs are unknown; <br />however, in general, some policy objectives increase the need for complexity and likely increase <br />administrative expense. For example: <br /> <br /> <br />?A fee that requires a new unit of measurement in the billing system (e.g. building square <br />footage as an estimating unit for parking spaces, along with land use types by customer) <br />would require more resources to implement than one which is tied to a current unit (e.g. <br />impervious area associated with existing stormwater accounts); <br /> <br />?A fee that requires new customer categories would require more resources to implement <br />than one which corresponds to a current category; <br /> <br />?A fee that allows for variability based on changeable customer characteristics or behaviors <br />requires more resources than one which remains fixed for a site across time. <br /> <br />Staff recommends implementing a fee structure that best meets policy objectives while achieving a <br />balance with administrative efficiency. <br /> <br />Example Rate Structure and Fees <br /> <br />While a rate and fee structure incorporating requisite data and all applicable rate factors and <br />assumptions has not yet been established, staff has prepared example rates and generalized fees <br />using a rate model based on broad assumptions and the best currently-available data. Based on this <br />preliminary rate model, using a target revenue of $6.5 million and estimating approximately 240,000 <br />parking spaces being billed within the utility results in a monthly rate of about $2.25 per parking <br />unit (space). Table A provides an example of a simple rate structure’s customer categories and rate <br />per unit of size for each category. This is purely an example to provide context for the various <br />options and factors considered in this memorandum. <br /> <br />Table A – Example Draft Customer Categories and Monthly Fee per Unit of Measure <br /> <br />Category Description Unit of Estimated Fee per <br />Measure Parking Unit of <br />per Unit Measure <br />of <br />Measure <br />Residential Single-family home on an individual lot is one Dwelling 2.0 $4.50 <br />Customersdwelling unit. Duplexes, triplexes and apartments Unit <br /> <br />(assuming a single treated as multiple dwelling units. <br />category) <br /> <br />Non-residential Example based on sampled ratio of parking spaces 1000 Sq. 2.1 $4.75 <br />Customersper 1000 square feet of available parking area Ft. <br /> <br />(assuming a single across a variety of non-residential customer types. Available <br />category) Parking <br />Area <br /> <br />B,SUF P67 <br />ATTACHMENT TREET TILITY EE AGE OF <br />