Laserfiche WebLink
<br />responsible for paying a premise’s water and sewer utility charges would be responsible for paying <br />the street light fee which in most cases is the occupant of improved property. Undeveloped <br />properties would be exempt. <br /> <br />Key considerations for determining the amount and structure of the lighting fee include: <br />Determine revenue requirements, uses and limitations on funds derived from fee; <br /> <br />? <br />Determine criteria, if any, for including capital project funding in the allowable uses of <br /> <br />? <br />funds; <br />Consider potential methods and implications of accounting for differing levels of service of <br /> <br />? <br />local area street lighting; <br />Evaluate policy options for neighborhood areas to request differing levels or “opt out” of <br /> <br />? <br />local street lighting service; <br />Establish rate structures for residential customers; <br /> <br />? <br />Determine sizing factors, if any, for non-residential fees; and, <br /> <br />? <br />Establish billing and collection systems. <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />Each key factor is further discussed below. <br /> <br />Basis for Revenue Requirements, Capital Funding <br />The subcommittee recommended fee revenue would be dedicated to provision of street and bike <br />path lighting with a target net annual revenue of approximately $850,000. This target was <br />estimated to cost the average household approximately $1.50 per month. The revenue from the fee <br />as recommended by the subcommittee would be dedicated to provision of street and bike path <br />lighting. The subcommittee also discussed the potential for a process by which neighborhoods <br />could request and pay for a higher or lower level of lighting service. <br />The city currently spends about $845,000 per year to operate and maintain the city’s street and bike <br />path lighting system. Of this total, about $440,000 is for lighting on arterial/collector streets and <br />$360,000 is for lighting on neighborhood streets. Cost for lighting bike paths is about $45,000. <br /> <br />The subcommittee target revenue considers operation and maintenance requirements but does not <br />include capital funding for rehabilitation, upgrades and new capital facilities. Staff suggest <br />considering the potential for capital rehabilitation and upgrades within allowable uses and the use of <br />other existing capital project funding sources and methods to fund construction of new street lights. <br /> <br />New street light construction currently falls into two general categories, lighting on arterial and <br />collector streets and bike paths, and lighting improvements on local streets. Three funding <br />mechanisms are used: transportation systems development charge revenues for lighting on arterial <br />and collector streets and bike paths; property owner funded improvements via assessments under a <br />local improvement district; and, developer-funded lighting improvements on local streets in <br />conjunction with new development. Local improvement districts provide a mechanism by which <br />neighborhoods can request and pay for a higher level of lighting service. <br /> <br />Rate Structure, Differing Levels of Service <br />C,S&PLF P25 <br />ATTACHMENT TREET ATH IGHTING EE AGE OF <br /> <br />