My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 10/22/07 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2007
>
CC Minutes - 10/22/07 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:32:06 AM
Creation date
11/28/2007 2:33:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />Council Chamber—Eugene City Hall <br /> <br /> October 22, 2007 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor, Betty Taylor, Bonny Bettman, George Poling, <br />Jennifer Solomon, Mike Clark, Alan Zelenka. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the regular meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br /> <br />1. PUBLIC FORUM <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy reviewed the rules of the Public Forum. <br /> <br />Gary Rayor <br />, 2373 Washington Street, noted that he had been a practicing civil engineer for 33 years. He <br />related that he had been asked by a Crest Drive resident who was a bicyclist to review the area streets. He <br />stated that the design of streets was governed by the Eugene Arterial/Collector Study. He said the study <br />indicated that for City initiated projects after the process included input from affected property owners and <br />affected persons the council approved the design the city engineer determined to be safe and functional. He <br />recalled that the City Engineer had stated that a safe and functional street design had 10-foot wide lanes and <br />shoulders. He averred that the resolution under consideration was more of a plan change and was not in <br />accordance with the Eugene street development standards, the policy on geometric design of highways and <br />streets, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guide for the <br />development of bike facilities, and it was not in conformance with the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. <br />He questioned whether this was the correct way to amend the Eugene Arterial/Collector Study. He asked if <br />it was wise for the council to consider less than the minimum city and national standards. He thought it <br />would put the City into a potential liability situation. He underscored that the AASHTO codes were based <br />on driver performance and one of the main tenets was “shy distance,” in that whenever a driver felt he or she <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 22, 2007 Page 1 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.