My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 12/10/07 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:28:25 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 11:42:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ridgeline Trail Corridor. She said there was not unanimous support for the grant application at the CCIGR <br />so it was brought before the full council. She stated that a grant application had been approved and had <br />been submitted on October 1 for Federal Forest Legacy funding, also for properties along the Ridgeline <br />Trail. She related that at the time of the CCIGR approval, the City’s match for the grant had been proposed <br />to be 25 percent of the total. Subsequent to this, she had been advised that the application would be more <br />competitive if the City could match at the 50 percent rate. In order to do this, staff was proposing the <br />additional grant application to OWEB to offset it and keep Eugene’s match at 25 percent. <br /> <br />Ms. Weiss described three potential scenarios: <br />? <br /> The City could gain approval for both grants for approximately $3 million and the City’s match <br />would be approximately $1 million. <br />? <br /> The Forest Legacy grant could be approved and the OWEB grant could not gain approval which <br />would likely increase the City’s level of matching funds or the City would have to try to get funding <br />from another source or the City could withdraw its request for funding from the Forest Legacy. <br />? <br /> The OWEB grant funding could be approved and the Forest Legacy funding could not be approved <br />in which case the City could try to determine if there were other sources for financing available of it <br />could withdraw its request to OWEB for funding. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz commented that she was puzzled about why this item was coming forward in the face of the <br />council’s direction to pursue the purchase of the Beverly/Green properties. She asked if staff was working <br />on that acquisition. Ms. Weiss responded that the appraisal process was underway to understand the values <br />of those properties. This project was happening simultaneously with the pursuit of acquisition of properties <br />that meet the Ridgeline Trail criteria and with finding ways to leverage bond measure money with other <br />sources as much as possible. <br /> <br />In response to a follow-up question from Ms. Ortiz, Mr. Lidz explained that staff would be before the <br />council with regard to the Beverly/Green properties when the appraisals were complete. He underscored <br />that prior to knowing the cost it was difficult to bring discussion to the table regarding funding sources. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if the three properties for which the grant application was made had been <br />appraised. Ms. Weiss responded that they had not yet been appraised. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if there was documentation to prove that the City’s grant application would be <br />more competitive if there was a 50 percent match. Ms. Weiss replied that the advice had come in conversa- <br />tions staff had been party to after a training staff had attended in Portland. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman ascertained from Ms. Weiss that the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Bond <br />contained $2 million dedicated to the Golden Gardens Park. She asked how much more the additional <br />acreage that was being purchased allegedly for the potential move of the county fairgrounds. Ms. Weiss <br />responded that the POS division was not exceeding the $2 million bond money for the Golden Gardens Park. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman commented that now the City was getting 300 acres for $2 million, whereas before it was <br />purchasing 100 acres for that amount of money. She called that a “huge discrepancy in numbers.” She <br />asked how the City could do this. Ms. Weiss replied that she believed that there were additional funding <br />sources that could be used for that park, such as systems development charges (SDCs). <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman ascertained from Ms. Weiss that SDCs were also available for the Beverly/Green <br />properties. She asserted that people voting for the bond did not know that land was being purchased with <br />the money with the thought in mind that the land could eventually be purchased by the County. She opined <br />that this was a misuse of that money. She said she would support the grant application at the 25 percent <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 8, 2007 Page 9 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.