My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 12/10/07 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:28:25 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 11:42:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Inerfeld stated that the OMPOC advanced interests common to Oregon’s designated Metropolitan <br />Planning Organizations (MPOs). He said as the MPO for the Eugene/Springfield Metro area the Metropoli- <br />tan Policy Committee (MPC) was a member of OMPOC. He reported that OMPOC was seeking feedback <br />from the MPC on its draft legislative policy concepts and objectives document and the MPC requested that <br />its member governments provide comment on it. He noted that the CCIGR reviewed “a few versions” of the <br />document. He related that the draft was intended to serve as a guide for the OMPOC legislative agenda. He <br />added that the OMPOC summit scheduled for the following weekend had been postponed until 2008. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman thought the document should reflect the TransPlan policies and the policies that the City <br />adopted into its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) specifically that the City wanted to prioritize and fund <br />preservation and maintenance of the existing road system. She did not think the document reflected that this <br />was the City’s highest priority for funding. She wanted a bullet point that had been taken out of the <br />document to be restored that said a transportation funding package that provided equitable shares to counties <br />and cities should be advocated for and supported. She said she would add “and adequate resources”’ after <br />“equitable shares” to the previous. She suggested that the reference to maintenance and preservation of <br />roads should include local infrastructure because the money came from the gas tax. She averred that the <br />City of Eugene needed to be able to use its gas tax money for maintenance and preservation. <br /> <br />Continuing, Councilor Bettman cited a bullet point that said “advocate and support efforts to increase the <br />capacity and efficiency of the public transit system in Oregon” and suggested that the words “and fund” be <br />added after “support.” She stated that there was nothing in the document that discussed access management. <br />She noted that the document said at the top “Oregonians need to strategically invest in all modes of <br />transportation” and suggested that it be changed to include the words “equitably and proportionally” after <br />the word “invest.” She said 20 percent of the population did not drive and predicted the numbers would <br />increase as baby boomers aged. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor stated that she had responded by email. She indicated that she was in agreement with <br />Councilor Bettman. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Angel Jones <br />City Manager pro tem <br /> <br />(Recorded by Ruth Atcherson) <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 8, 2007 Page 13 <br /> Regular Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.