My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Ordinance Concerning the Transition of Annexation Procedures
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 12/10/07 Meeting
>
Item 5: Ordinance Concerning the Transition of Annexation Procedures
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:52:02 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 2:12:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT A <br />12/10/07 – V-7 <br />(8) Even if a proposed extension is inconsistent with the criteria above, the <br />city may approve an extra-territorial extension of water or sewer service <br />consistent with adopted city resolutions, policies, plans and ordinances: <br />(a) Where a communicable disease hazard exists and the extension is <br />the only practical remedy; or <br />(b) To property within a dissolved water district within which EWEB is <br />providing service to some properties. <br /> <br /> This section establishes the criteria which the City will use as the basis for rendering <br />[Comment: <br />decisions for extra-territorial extensions. To ensure consistency with adopted Council policies, the <br />approval criteria in 9.8121 are taken from Council Resolution 2643 (10/31/07 Council packet, pages <br />43-47), and Metro Plan Growth Management policies 21 and 22. In the past, those policies informed <br />whether the City would recommend approval to the Boundary Commission. Council could change its <br />policy direction with respect to these criteria and/or add criteria. <br /> <br />Revisions since the 11/19/07 draft: <br />Revisions to EC 9.8121(2) are to maintain existing city policy by requiring a greater <br />justification to satisfy this criterion than “non contiguity.” <br /> <br />Revisions to EC 9.8121(3) are to clarify that the required annexation agreements must be <br />satisfactory to the city. <br /> <br />Revisions to EC 9.8121(8) are to require consistency with adopted city policies, even in the <br />case of extensions to abate communicable disease hazards or to serve areas previously served <br />by a dissolved water district. This will more clearly allow the Council to rely on policies and <br />] <br />definitions in, for example, Resolution No. 2643. <br /> <br />Section 8. <br /> This Ordinance is intended to address the City’s increased <br />responsibilities due to the State Legislature’s passage of SB 417 abolishing the Lane <br />County Boundary Commission. The provisions of this Ordinance are intended to carry <br />forward, to the extent applicable, adopted City policies regarding annexations, extra- <br />territorial extensions, and public service district withdrawals. The legislative findings <br />attached hereto as Exhibit A are adopted in support of this Ordinance. <br />[Comment: Revisions since the 11/19/07 draft support the Council’s future reliance on <br />existing policies to guide decision-making.] <br /> <br />Ordinance - <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.