Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />At the July 9 meeting, the council requested that when the condemnation ordinance came back for <br />action, that the immediate effective date clause in the ordinance be deleted, and that language be added <br />describing the importance of preserving the property. Discussion at the council’s October 22 work <br />session also included a request by some councilors that the action be split into two ordinances, one for <br />each property. Attachment A is a revised ordinance with the changes requested at the July 9 meeting, <br />applicable to the Beverly property. Attachment B is an identical ordinance, except that it is applicable to <br />the Green property. <br /> <br />At the July 9 meeting, the council also asked for additional information. In response to that request, <br />attached are several documents. Attachment C is a vicinity map that shows the location of the two <br />properties. Attachment D is a copy of a May 11 memo from the City Attorney’s Office that provides an <br />overview of the condemnation procedures. Attachment E is a copy of a May 3 memo from the Planning <br />Division that describes the zoning and history of each of the properties. Attachment F is a copy of a <br />May 4 memo from the Parks and Open Space Planning Manager that provides information from a <br />“parks” perspective on the value of the two properties. Attachment G is a copy of an October 25 memo <br />from the Finance Director that discusses potential funding sources for the purchase of the properties. <br />Attachment H is a December 4 memo from the Finance Director that includes updated information about <br />potential funding sources and the trade-offs that the council would have to make in using those resources <br />for purchase of these properties. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The Parks, Recreation and Open Space Project and Priority Plan was adopted by the City Council on <br />? <br /> <br />May 22, 2006. <br />A Parks, Athletic Fields and Open Space Bond Measure was passed by Eugene voters on November <br />? <br /> <br />7, 2006. <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />1.Direct the City Manager to (a) make offers on one or both properties based on recent information <br />related to the fair market value of the property, and (b) bring back to the council whatever action is <br />necessary to use the [ insert name of fund or funds] to pay for the acquisitions. <br /> <br />2.Adopt one or both of the condemnation ordinances and direct the City Manager to bring back to the <br />council whatever action is necessary to use the [insert name of fund or funds] to pay for the <br />acquisitions. <br /> <br />3.Direct the City Manager to bring back to the council more information about possible funding <br />packages and trade-offs related to the use of certain funding sources for acquisition of one or both of <br />the properties. <br /> <br />4.Take no action. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />The City Manager recommends taking no further action on these ordinances at this time; however, the <br />acquisition of these properties will continue, providing the owner(s) indicate a willingness to sell at land <br />values consistent with our previous acquisitions along the ridgeline. The City Manager recommends <br />delaying action because the cost of acquiring the properties would place a substantial burden on <br />potential funding sources, thus limiting the City's ability to pursue other important projects or property <br /> F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M071210\S0712106.doc <br /> <br />