Laserfiche WebLink
wanted in the project, and following the committee’s report to the council, she hoped the community could <br />weigh in on its recommendations before the council adopted it. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka pointed out that people were objecting to a plan that was not in place. The City did not <br />know if the businesses downtown would be local or non-local in nature. He suggested that people were <br />misinterpreting Table 5 in the packet, which was an example list of what the project could include. The City <br />could still decide to include more public amenities and less parking. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka agreed that the project goal was not to make the developer rich, and suggested it instead <br />responded to community demand for downtown revitalization. He envisioned a downtown that was a vibrant <br />neighborhood with housing and interesting shops and restaurants that would draw people downtown and <br />create new jobs. He wanted a downtown the community could be proud of. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark concurred with the remarks of Councilor Zelenka. He recalled the council’s goal setting <br />session where the council adopted downtown as a goal. He thanked staff for trying to put all the pieces in <br />place to help the council accomplish that goal. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said that all the public input was gathered before there was a project with a clearly <br />defined cost estimate. She thought that made a sham of the public process. She suggested that the City <br />have a plan and price tag and then ask the community if it was willing to pay for it with the clear under- <br />standing the money would be diverted from other taxing districts. Instead, staff and the council majority had <br />its own way in regard to the BEDI grant, the public input took place based on a conceptual plan, and the <br />council was now being asked to approve the spending increase based on that plan. She did not think <br />Councilor Zelenka should criticize those who thought the City lacked a plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said she believed in the good will of all involved and that all wanted a good downtown. <br />People just had different ideas of how to reach that goal. She invited all to be part of the discussion and to <br />work on the issue of downtown together as it is something for the entire community. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka said he was not criticizing people for criticizing the “plan that’s not a plan”; he was <br />suggesting they “hold their horses” until there was a plan, and he believed the process he initiated would get <br />the City to a plan. He said the City created numerous opportunities for comment. He hoped that those <br />offering comments helped to mold and shape the plan so the eventual plan was reflective of the public input <br />and what Eugene would support. He believed the developers knew what they were doing and would build <br />what people wanted. He hoped the project that was proposed would be supported by the community. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman suggested that if Councilor Zelenka believed that people should wait until there was a <br />plan he would support her substitute motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman moved to postpone action on the motion until the council had a plan <br />and an estimate of the actual project costs. Roll call vote; the motion failed, 6:2; coun- <br />cilors Taylor and Bettman voting yes. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting no. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council August 13, 2007 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />