Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilor Bettman thought the amendment irrelevant to the issue of drinking and driving and the danger to <br />public health. In addition, drinking at games created a huge enforcement issue for the Eugene Police <br />Department, which the amendment that had been offered did not address. The revised ordinance would <br />compound that problem. She did not want to set up an expectation among Duck fans that drinking and <br />driving was condoned by the City because it was willing to make an exception to the existing law. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy reiterated her belief that drinking should be stopped after the third quarter thereby making the <br />situation safer for the community. She invited the council to amend the motion thusly. <br /> <br />Mr. Lidz said that Chief Lehner had pointed out that there was another reference to ending drinking two <br />hours after the game was completed within the ordinance itself. He suggested the motion could be amended <br />to amend section 1 of the ordinance by substituting the word “when” for the phrase “two hours after.” That <br />would replace the phrase “two hours after game” in two places; one in the existing ordinance, and one in the <br />proposed amendment. Councilors Ortiz and Poling accepted the amendment. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting no. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka said the wife and children of a dear friend were killed by a drunk driver and he <br />understood what happened to people and their families when people decided to drink and drive. It was a big <br />societal issue that would take more than action by the Eugene City Council to eradicate. He had observed <br />tailgating at Autzen Stadium and believed that most people behaved responsibly. Those that did not created <br />a problem, but he did not want to penalize many people to punish a few people. Councilor Zelenka <br />acknowledged the City’s lack of enforcement capacity in regard to the current law prohibiting such drinking, <br />and suggested the next best thing the council could do was to regulate it. He believed the proposed <br />ordinance was an appropriate regulation and wanted the area regulated to be as small as possible. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka had asked staff to find out where people were tailgating and it appeared they were divided <br />between Centennial Loop and the Autzen Stadium area. As that was the area where tailgating was <br />happening, he supported the boundaries, despite his initial objection. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka said he did not think the City’s actions would increase drinking, but rather would regulate <br />it. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark offered a friendly amendment to include the businesses immediately adjacent to Martin <br />Luther King, Jr. Boulevard to the south, so the boundaries included those lots adjacent to the street not now <br />included in the map. He said it seemed arbitrary to exclude them. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor determined from Sergeant Pete Kerns that there may be tailgating in the area identified by <br />Councilor Clark but an assessment done by the department did not produce any pay for use parking lots, <br />which was the focus of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilors Pryor and Ortiz declined to accept the friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark wanted to treat all businesses in the immediate area in the same manner and said it <br />appeared the ordinance differentiated between those residents who paid and those who did not. He thought <br />the council would face the same problem it faced now in regard to enforcement if it excluded that area. The <br />City would have geographically isolated the issue. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 24, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />