Laserfiche WebLink
David Thor Johnson <br />, 4986 Hunters Glen Drive, suggested that the councilors give themselves a raise. He <br />heard that the City was considering purchasing land for the Ridgeline Trail project outside of the urban <br />growth boundary (UGB). He urged the council not to forget the Beverly/Green properties which could <br />become parks within the UGB. <br /> <br />Tom Halferty <br />, 4510 Manzanita Street, echoed Mr. Johnson. He supported the idea of a green “ring around <br />Eugene.” He supported the concept of the Ridges to Rivers and actually acquiring properties. However, he <br />urged the City to acquire the Beverly/Green properties first. He expressed some concern that the properties <br />would be dropped from the slate. <br /> <br />Lisa Warnes <br />, 5020 Nectar Way, heard that the City was applying for a Forest Legacy matching grant for <br />land outside of the UGB. She had “worked around the clock” to get people to back the parks bond in 2006. <br />She felt that “many” people voted for it thinking it would be used to purchase the Beverly/Green properties. <br />She averred that it would kill an important funding tool for the Amazon Headwaters acquisition if outside <br />properties were purchased first. She provided pictures of La Jolla, California, landslides to substantiate her <br />belief that building on hillsides was not prudent. <br /> <br />Zachary Vishanoff <br />, a resident living on Patterson Street, averred that giving one’s address acted as a <br />deterrent to some people who would otherwise testify. He believed that there would be more citizen <br />engagement now that this requirement had been lifted. He provided the council with copies of an article on <br />historic buildings on the University of Oregon campus, one of which was MacArthur Court. He said there <br />had been discussion of razing that building, which he believed to be very important. He felt that whether the <br />building should be razed should be a “full community decision.” He opined that the University “had a <br />habit” of leaving low-income houses that it owned empty. He declared that it would be “obscene” to leave <br />25 or 30 homes empty while there would be a need for housing during the 2008 Olympic Trials. He asserted <br />that the University would have to fix them in order to utilize them and that it was unwilling to do so. He <br />called the University a “slum lord” and the retention of vacant housing “strategic degradation.” He wanted <br />to get the council to rethink weighing in on the University’s alleged request for more autonomy from the <br />Oregon university system. <br /> <br />Lyndell Wilken <br />, 3065 Whitbeck Boulevard, member of the Crest Drive Community Team (CDCT), stated <br />that her role in the process had been to represent bicyclists in the community with regard to the design <br />concepts for the Crest Drive area roads. She related that she had a good working relationship with the <br />CDCT but she had one concern. She said there had been bicycle lanes included in the design on the uphill <br />sides of Crest Drive by Wayne Morse Ranch and on Friendly Street through the second open house. She felt <br />that when smaller subcommittees composed of “just street-front people” were convened, the bicycle <br />amenities disappeared. She said it was thought that traffic-calming features would be adequate to slow <br />traffic and make it safe for bicyclists. She thought the issues concerning bicyclists had not been adequately <br />addressed. She underscored that both an 18-foot and a 20-foot road looked narrow to a cyclist. She wanted <br />to find a way to get bicycles out of the traffic lane while retaining a “country look.” <br /> <br />Robert Newland <br />, 3895 Vine Maple Street, stated that he was the proposed developer of the property at <br />1360 and 1372 Patterson Street for which action had been scheduled on a Multiple Unit Property Tax <br />Exemption (MUPTE). He wished to underscore that he had worked diligently to design an architecturally <br />interesting building with balconies and courtyards that would incorporate sustainability features. He <br />predicted the structure would enable residents and the City Council 50 to 100 years from now to look back <br />and be pleased that it was not just another “big box” that would densify the area. He asked that the council <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 8, 2007 Page 2 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />