Laserfiche WebLink
<br />basic service television connections to publicly owned buildings, provision of a fourth access channel for <br />Public Safety Training and an additional annual payment from Comcast of a $50,000 Capital Contribution <br />for public education and government access channels. She reviewed a number of other provisions and said <br />the new agreement served the public interest and did not provide Comcast exclusive rights to the Eugene <br />market since other providers were welcome to obtain Franchise to market services in the community. She <br />did not believe that further negotiations would result in significant gains. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy opened the public hearing. There being no one wishing to testify, she closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked if the City could find another provider. Ms. Berrian replied that rights-of-way had always <br />been open to other providers but another provider had not come forward, likely due to the infrastructure <br />expense. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor noted that basic cable services had been reduced again while rates were increased. She said if <br />those things were outside the City's control, perhaps another provider could be sought. She asked about the <br />consequences if the franchise agreement was not renewed. Ms. Berrian said if the proposal was not <br />accepted a formal renewal process established under federal rules would have to be undertaken; if the <br />council chose not to renew after that formal process, none of the provisions she highlighted in the agreement <br />would exist. <br /> <br />Mr. Mecham said there were few providers seeking to expand into the Eugene market and the likely result of <br />not renewing the current franchise agreement was that the City would have even less control over cable <br />television services. He was not certain that Comcast would remain without a franchise agreement, which <br />could leave the City with no cable television services. He thought the better approach to obtaining more <br />choices for subscribers was to renew the franchise while encouraging competitors. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she had heard that low-income subscribers had very few channels currently. Ms. Berrian <br />said she had received complaints about the most basic tier of service. She said those issues had to be <br />addressed at the federal level, but local governments could advocate for better oversight. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if the City was making the additional $50,000 payment for education and government <br />access channels. Ms. Berrian replied that Comcast would make that payment to the City. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked for clarification of the income that would be excluded under the new agreement. Ms. <br />Berrian said there were two types of disputed income: income from advertising commissions and subscriber <br />territory and income received when new programs were launched within the subscriber territory. She said a <br />dispute over commissions had resulted in a settlement and the agreement provided for a $200,000 payment <br />to the three jurisdictions in lieu of that income. <br /> <br /> <br />5. PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Concerning the Police Commission and Amending <br />Sections 2.013 and 2.368 of the Eugene Code, 1971 <br /> <br />Linda Phelps, Eugene Police Department, provided an overview of the amendments, which addressed issues <br />that had been raised by the City Council. She said those issues included elimination of a position appointed <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 15, 2007 Page 10 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />