Laserfiche WebLink
<br />sensitive design and 18-foot street widths would preserve the character while providing pedestrian and <br />bicycle amenities and traffic calming. <br /> <br /> <br />Don Neet <br />, 3434 Storey Boulevard, Eugene, said he was on the design team and his property would be <br />assessed. He said Storey Boulevard had the highest traffic speed and steepest grade of all roads in the <br />neighborhood. He said there were limited options for traffic calming and one of them was an 18-foot street <br />width. He said the design process examined problems related to school buses and garbage trucks and <br />concluded there were no issues. <br /> <br />Jill Sager <br />, 2945 Friendly Street, Eugene, said she was an assessed property owner. She had lived in the <br />neighborhood for 12 years and walked daily. She felt safe as a pedestrian and appreciated the rural <br />character of the area. She said the wider roadway and sidewalks on the northern end of Friendly Street <br />created an urban environment and that would be inconsistent with the Crest Drive neighborhood character. <br />She urged support for narrower streets. <br /> <br />Fred Lorish <br />, Eugene, said his property would be assessed for the project. He reviewed the history of the <br />context sensitive design solutions process and consensus model. He said the themes and values that emerged <br />from that process would be enhanced by narrower roadways and asked for the council's support of 18-foot <br />street widths. <br /> <br />Robbin Howard <br />, 3217 Whitten Drive, Eugene, said her property would not be assessed, but she would be <br />affected by the changes. She agreed with previous speakers in support of 18-foot street widths, which would <br />be safer and encouraged physical activity. She did not think that the design should cater to large vehicles <br />when companies could use smaller ones. She preferred not to use scarce resources to promote more vehicle <br />use. <br /> <br />Michael Boutette <br />, 2970 Friendly Street, Eugene, said his property would be assessed. He supported 18- <br />foot street widths and had seen no evidence that the current streets presented problems for emergency <br />vehicles. He said narrower streets would preserve the rural character of the neighborhood, which is what <br />drew many residents to the area, and would also slow traffic. He did not want to see the neighborhood <br />subjected to a "cookie cutter" design. <br /> <br />Paul Moor <br />, 2586 Potter Street, Eugene, stated he had previously lived on Mary Lane and had frequently <br />biked the streets in the Crest Drive neighborhood. He distributed a drawing of the proposed street design <br />and said that 9- and 10-foot travel lanes would not safely accommodate a car and bicycle at the same time. <br />He also distributed a petition from neighborhood residents and non-residents opposing narrower streets. <br /> <br />Eric Selker <br />, 3765 University Street, Eugene, commented on the wide range of bicycle accommodations <br />across Europe. He said that in those areas where people used bicycles extensively the primary factor was <br />safety, not the weather. He did not believe that a nine-foot travel lane without a bicycle accommodation was <br />a good idea and protection from cars would be provided at leave for those going uphill. <br /> <br />Jeanne Selker <br />, 2765 University Street, remarked that the steepness of the street was irrelevant; bicyclists <br />needed and would use a delineated travel lane that was smooth, whether it was a bike lane or sidewalk. She <br />said that bicycles should not have to be part of the vehicle traffic. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 15, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />