Laserfiche WebLink
<br />could make any use of the property that was permitted under the new zone. Ms. Hansen agreed, but noted <br />there were some limitations on uses due to the nodal development overlay. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked for clearer copies of the trip generation chart and other agenda packet materials. She did <br />not perceive a connection between modifying the FAR and increasing density in nodal areas. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy asked if Ms. Bettman wished to keep the record open. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if the applicant would be able to provide additional testimony if clearer copies of the <br />tables and graphs were provided to her. City Attorney Jerome Lidz replied that the materials were already in <br />the record and providing more legible copies would not change the record. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy closed the record and the public hearing. <br /> <br /> <br />3. PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Providing for an Intergovernmental Agreement to <br />Establish a Regional Fiber Consortium for the Ownership and Operation of a Fiber Optic Sys- <br />tem; and Repealing Ordinance No. 20181 <br /> <br />Pam Berrian, Telecom/Cable Program Manager, introduced Milo Mecham with the Lane Council of <br />Governments, who was available to answer questions. She reviewed the proposed ordinance, which would <br />merge two western Oregon public fiber consortia that had been working together for several years. She <br />explained the Fiber South Consortium, composed of Oregon city and county governments, owned an intra- <br />Oregon fiber optic backbone. She said the Regional Fiber Consortium existed nearby and both organiza- <br />tions were established eight years ago when two fiber backbone providers gave several miles of dark fiber to <br />cities and counties in exchange for a 20-year waiver of rights-of-way use fees; in Eugene's case that <br />represented 66 feet of rights-of-way. She said merging the local government consortia under one organiza- <br />tional government body was permitted under State law ORS 190. <br /> <br />Ms. Berrian said the fiber was lit by a private provider chosen by a competitive process and the intention of <br />the urban/rural partnership was to deliver high speed broadband and voice services to nearby, but less urban <br />areas that did not have affordable access to such services. She emphasized that the merger would not create <br />new obligations for the City and the City's actions would remain voluntary; any financial obligation would <br />apply to Eugene only if Eugene agreed to the obligation beforehand. She said the partnership would serve <br />the public interest and reflect the reality of the administration of both networks. She said nothing in the <br />agreement reduced or adversely impacted Eugene's financial or program authority. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy opened the public hearing and called for testimony. <br /> <br />Drix <br />, Eugene, said his background was in communication and reviewed the changes in growth in the field <br />over the past several decades. He said the Internet represented a vast river of knowledge and wonder that <br />represented freedom and was accessible to a majority of the population, but it was important that everyone <br />be connected. He said fiber optics was the future and urged the council to support the ordinance. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy closed the hearing. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 15, 2007 Page 7 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />