Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Type II land use process. This process requires public notice to properties within 300 feet and an <br />administrative decision by the Planning Director. That decision can be appealed to the City’s Hearings <br />Official who would hold a public hearing to consider the matter. <br /> <br />Section 9.8121 also provides the criteria of approval for all extra-territorial extensions. Each request <br />must meet all of the criteria in order to be approved. Most notable are the following criteria: <br />The property cannot be annexed for reasons other than the mere fact that the property is not <br />? <br /> <br />contiguous to the city <br />The property is not vacant <br />? <br /> <br />The provision of service will not prolong non-conforming uses <br />? <br /> <br /> <br />Section 9.8121(8) provides two exceptions to these criteria: <br />If the extension is the only practical remedy to a communicable disease hazard; or <br />? <br /> <br />The property is within a dissolved water district in which EWEB is providing service. <br />? <br /> <br /> <br />As the criteria in Section 9.8121 indicates, the intent is to provide a means for water or sewer service for <br />existing developed properties which cannot otherwise annex to the city. Conversely, these provisions <br />specifically discourage extra-territorial extensions as a means to accommodate growth or new <br />development without first annexing to the city. Resolution No. 2643 (on which these criteria were <br />based) provides a clear policy position that the urban services should not be provided outside of the city <br />except under unique circumstances. The provision of such services to the Airport, Lane Community <br />College and sewer service to River Road are examples of such circumstances. The Metro Plan provides <br />similar policy direction by prioritizing annexation as the primary means to receive urban services <br />(Policy 21, page II-C-6). The City’s land use code also supports this policy direction as explained <br />below. <br /> <br />Relationship to Annexation requirements <br />When discussing extra-territorial extensions, it is also important to understand the City’s existing <br />requirements for annexation. As noted above, the criteria for extra-territorial extensions are intended to <br />address existing circumstances, rather than accommodate future development potential. The <br />requirements for annexation provide an additional tool to ensure this occurs. These requirements were <br />not amended or impacted with the City Council’s adoption of Ordinance No. 20400. These provisions <br />have been in place for many years, with only a few revisions made since 2001 (LUCU). In general, the <br />following activities could not be considered without first annexing to the city: <br />Zone Changes <br />? <br /> <br />Partitions and Subdivisions <br />? <br /> <br />Planned Unit Developments <br />? <br /> <br />New dwellings <br />? <br /> <br />New commercial or industrial development <br />? <br /> <br />Expansion of existing commercial or industrial development which result in a need for additional <br />? <br /> <br />urban facilities and services <br /> <br />Based on these requirements, the approval of any extra-territorial extension would not enable a property <br />to further develop. The triggers described above would apply to all properties regardless of the urban <br />services that are currently provided to the site. Quite simply, if a property owner of land outside the city <br />limits requested approval of any land use action listed above, they would first be required to annex to the <br />city before any such application could be processed, regardless of whether they had previously obtained <br />an extra-territorial extension or not. <br /> F:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080123\S080123A.doc <br /> <br />