My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: City of Eugene Elections Code Revision
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 02/11/08 Work Session/URA
>
Item C: City of Eugene Elections Code Revision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:28 PM
Creation date
2/8/2008 11:27:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Petitions to Be Submitted During Business Hours <br />EC 2.970 was amended to clarify that both prospective petitions and completed petitions ready <br />for signature verification must be submitted in person to the City Recorder at the City Recorder’s <br />Office during business hours. This section was added to eliminate confusion about filing <br />petitions with the City Recorder following evening council meetings. <br /> <br />Referred Ordinance Not to Take Effect During Signature Gathering/Verification <br />To refer an ordinance to the voters, petitioners must obtain the number of signatures required by <br />EC 2.972 before the effective date specified in the ordinance. If the petitioners obtain the <br />required number of signatures, the ordinance does not take effect unless and until the voters <br />approve it at an election. That much is settled law, but there has been some question about the <br />status of a referred ordinance during the fifteen days that Lane County Elections spends verifying <br />the signatures on a referendum petition. An Attorney General’s opinion suggests that referred <br />legislation does not take effect during the period of signature verification, and that conclusion <br />avoids the possibility that the ordinance would be in effect for only fifteen days. The proposed <br />amendments to EC 2.971 would confirm that an ordinance subject to a referendum petition does <br />not take effect until it has been determined that the petitioners did not collect enough valid <br />signatures, or the voters approve the ordinance at an election. <br /> <br />Submission of Petitions and Signature Gathering <br />EC 2.973 through 2.975 outline the process and requirements for submission of prospective <br />petitions for initiative and referendum measures as well as the process and requirements for <br />signature collection. The current code is difficult to follow and provisions regulating prospective <br />petitions and signature gathering are scattered throughout various code sections. Because the <br />code sections governing prospective petitions and signature collection are of primary importance <br />to citizens who want to utilize the initiative or referendum process, the proposed amendments to <br />EC 2.973 through 2.975 reorder those sections to lay out a step-by-step, chronological process <br />for submitting prospective petitions and signature gathering. <br /> <br />Ballot Title Challenge Process <br />The proposed amendments to the City’s ballot title appeal process present one of the policy <br />issues for the council to consider. EC 2.977 governs the City’s ballot title challenge process. <br />State law clearly allows the City to adopt its own ballot title appeal process for initiatives and <br />elector-initiated referenda, but it is unclear as to the ballot title appeal process for council- <br />referred measures. The Secretary of State has directed county elections officials not to accept <br />council-referred <br /> measures unless they comply with the ballot title appeal process contained in <br />state statutes, which differs significantly from the ballot title appeal process currently in the <br />Code. In particular, the state ballot title appeal process includes a publication requirement and <br />provides that ballot title appeals must be decided by the Lane County Circuit Court rather than <br />council-referred measures <br />the City Council. The Secretary of State’s directive only applies to ; <br />initiative and referendum measures <br />county elections officials will accept that comply with the <br />ballot title appeal process in the Eugene Code. Therefore, the council could choose to have two <br />different ballot title appeal processes -- the City Code process for initiative and referendum <br />measures and the state law process for council-referred measures. However, in the interests of <br />uniformity and transparency for citizens, staff recommends that the council adopt the state ballot <br />title appeal process for initiative, referendum and council-referred measures. <br /> <br />Council to Refrain from Acting During 61-Day Period Before Election <br />This proposed revision presents another policy choice for the council. EC 2.980 currently <br />provides that the council must take action to adopt an ordinance proposed by initiative petition or <br />F:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080211\S080211C.DOC <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.