My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
JEO Meeting - Eugene Issues List
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 02/12/08 Joint Elected Officials
>
JEO Meeting - Eugene Issues List
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 11:16:39 AM
Creation date
2/8/2008 12:49:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JEO Issues List – Page 2 of 4 <br />(CCR) to help advise the City on next steps. Staff, with direct input from the CCR, revised the <br />Council’s action plan which was adopted in May 2007. One of the foundational elements of the <br />action plan is the development of a Diversity and Equity Strategic Plan. This plan, to be completed <br />in 2008, will guide the organization’s work to ensure a respectful workplace for all City employees <br />and equitable service delivery to all members of the community. <br /> <br /> Transportation Planning/Funding – At its November 8, 2007 meeting, the Metropolitan Policy <br />o <br />Committee (MPC) adopted the 2031 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The State Transportation <br />Planning Rule (TPR) requires that Transportation System Plans, such as TransPlan, be consistent <br />with RTPs. According to the TPR, once the RTP is approved by the MPC, jurisdictions that are <br />party to TransPlan–Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County–have one year to do one of the <br />following: <br /> Find that TransPlan is consistent with the RTP; <br />o <br /> Update TransPlan to be consistent with the RTP; or <br />o <br /> Develop a work plan for updating TransPlan to be consistent with the RTP and have this <br />o <br />work plan approved by the State Land Conservation and Development Commission <br />(LCDC). <br /> <br />Since the RTP adoption, staff members from the local jurisdictions have held two meetings with <br />ODOT and DLCD staff as well as several meetings amongst ourselves to discuss next steps. The <br />broad consensus is that the third bullet, developing a work plan to update TransPlan, is the right <br />approach. This recognizes that an update is necessary and that it will take longer than a year, <br />especially considering coordination with the comprehensive lands analysis and possible associated <br />Metro Plan updates. City staff and regional partners will continue to coordinate with ODOT and <br />DLCD on development of a draft work plan for a TransPlan update and will present a proposed <br />timeline, draft work plan, and associated costs at the April 9, 2008 City Council Meeting. <br /> <br />Area Commissions on Transportation: In 1996, the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) <br />authorized regionally-based transportation advisory commissions known as Area Commissions on <br />Transportation (ACTs) in order to expand opportunities for local citizen involvement in ODOT’s <br />decision-making. The OTC responded to local jurisdictions and other stakeholders asking for more <br />opportunity to participate in the early stages of transportation project selection. ACTs consider <br />regional and local transportation issues if they affect the state system and they work with other local <br />organizations dealing with transportation-related issues. ACTs play a key advisory role in the <br />development of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), which schedules <br />funded transportation projects. ACTs establish a public process for area project selection priorities, <br />and following adopted project eligibility criteria, prioritize transportation problems and solutions <br />and recommend projects in their area to be included in the STIP. A total of ten ACTs have <br />previously been formed representing all of Oregon except the Portland Metro area and Lane <br />County. Lane County elected not to establish an ACT and, instead, ODOT works with the <br />Eugene/Springfield Metropolitan Policy Committee and the Lane County Board of Commissioners <br />to coordinate transportation project planning and construction. <br /> <br />Transportation Funding: The City of Eugene has a documented backlog of deferred street <br />maintenance in excess of $170 million while Springfield and Lane County also face shortfalls in <br />transportation funding. A series of dynamic and complex issues related to intergovernmental <br />transportation funding solutions adds both opportunity and uncertainty to the mix. <br />Intergovernmental solutions, including the two mentioned below, are consistent with the <br />recommendations of the transportation funding subcommittee, but the outcomes are less certain <br />than those over which the council and the citizens of Eugene have direct control. Continue to <br />pursue other opportunities such as a countywide vehicle registration fee and/or countywide gas tax <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.