My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2: Ordinance Revising Elections Code
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 02/19/08 Public Hearing
>
Item 2: Ordinance Revising Elections Code
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:20:50 PM
Creation date
2/15/2008 11:02:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/19/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
before an election and require the opportunity for a ballot title appeal. If a referendum or council- <br />referred measure was filed with the City Recorder five days before the deadline for filing <br />measures with county officials, it would not allow enough time for a ballot title challenge, so the <br />proposed amendments repeal this section. <br /> <br />Word Limits for Additional Voters’ Pamphlet Arguments <br />The proposed amendments to EC 2.994(1)(c) limit additional arguments submitted to the voters’ <br />pamphlet (arguments in addition to the committee arguments in favor of or in opposition to a <br />measure and their respective rebuttals) to 325 words, which is the word limit imposed on <br />candidate statements under the requirements of the current code. The proposed revisions attempt <br />to take into account technological advances which, through reduced font size, could allow <br />extremely long arguments to fit within the space limitations contained in current code and <br />negatively impact readability of the argument. The proposed amendments attempt to ensure <br />readability of arguments and citizens’ access to information while allowing interested parties <br />space to make their arguments. <br /> <br />Elections – Voting by Mail <br />EC 2.1000 currently regulates the conduct of elections – both polling place elections and <br />elections conducted by mail. State law clearly gives responsibility to conduct elections by mail <br />to county elections officers, not City elections officers. All of the City Recorder’s <br />responsibilities under current section 2.1000 actually belong to county elections officials by <br />virtue of state law. Since all City elections are conducted by mail, and elections conducted by <br />mail are the purview of the county elections officials, staff proposes to amend section 2.1000 to <br />provide only that City elections must be conducted in accordance with state law. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br />The council may: <br />1. Direct the City Manager to bring the proposed ordinance to the council for action as <br />scheduled on March 10, 2008; or <br />2. Direct the City Manager to schedule another work session on the proposed amendments to <br />the Elections Code. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />The City Manager recommends proceeding with council action on the proposed ordinance on <br />March 10, 2008. <br /> <br /> <br />SUGGESTED MOTION <br /> <br />No motion is necessary to implement the City Manager’s recommendation, as the ordinance is <br />already scheduled for action on March 10. <br /> <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS <br /> <br />A. Draft Ordinance <br />B. Proposed Revisions to Elections Code with Commentary <br />C. Matrix Summarizing Proposed Changes <br /> <br />L:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080219\S0802192.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.