Laserfiche WebLink
<br />a comprehensive land inventory. Mr. Duncan preferred the term "property inventory;' with <br />the idea of identifying older, decaying areas that could use assistance with redevelopment. <br />He observed that they currently had no mechanism for determining where there was potential <br />for redevelopment or mixed centers. Mr. Duncan also felt that natural resource lands should <br />be included in the property inventury, resulting in a full land resource study. He provided <br />some examples of the utility of such a study. <br /> <br />Mr. Nystrom confirmed \vith the members that they supported such a comprehensive property <br />inventol)' and analysis. Ms. I-larding noted that there was existing propelty data; .Mr. Duncan <br />agreed, but said it \vas in several different places and thus was not useful for many types of <br />analysis. He thought that gathering all the existing data into one place would be a good start <br />at a useful database. Discussion ensued regarding compliance \vith HB 3337, the extent and <br />timing of the proposed inventory, and how it should be presented to the City Council. <br /> <br />IV. ITEMS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF <br /> <br />A. Other Items from Stan <br /> <br />There were no other items from staff. <br /> <br />n. Other Items from Commission <br /> <br />There were no other items from commissioners. <br /> <br />Mr. Duncan adjourned the meeting at 1: 17 p.m. <br /> <br />(Recorded by Bernie Burson) <br />Ill: \2007\planning and development departmeni\ptallntng division \planning commisslOn\pc071 0 i5.doc <br /> <br />MINUTES-----Eugene Planning Commission <br /> <br />October 15, 2007 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />