Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the entire area of the proposed node. Table 6 shows the current and proposed Afetro Plan <br />designations for Potential Node S-C. The proposed changes will increase the supply of commercial <br />land by 16.2%, decrease the supply of low density residential land by approximately 36.9% and <br />increase the supply of medium density residential land by 2.5%. See Exhibit H for additional <br />information. <br /> <br />Table 6: Current and Proposed Metro Plan Designations (Potential Node S-C) <br /> <br />Existing Condition Proposed Change <br />Total Acres % Total Acres Chan ed % Chan e Total Acres <br />36.7 33.3% 5.9 16.2% 42.6 <br />19.7 17.9% -7.3 -36.9% 12.4 <br />53.8 48.8% 1.3 2.5% 55.1 <br />110.2 110.2 <br /> <br />Desi nation <br />Commercial <br />Low Density Residential <br />Medium Densit Residential <br />Total <br /> <br />% Total <br />38.7% <br />11.3% <br />50.0% <br /> <br />Source: City of Eugene, analysis by Satre Associates, PC <br /> <br />Table 7 shows that zoning ratios within the Potential Node 5-C are similar to existing Metro Plan <br />designations. The main differences are that the Metro Plan does not include a Public Land category <br />and the zoning of the Potential Node 5-C area further ditlerentiates commercial into Neighborhood <br />and Community Commercial categories. From the table, it is evident that the only Neighborhood <br />Commercial within the nodal area is proposed to be removed with this application seeking to <br />replace it with an integrated mixed-use center that will function to provide a neighborhood level <br />connection. In addition, the table shows that the percent of zoned Medium Density Residential land <br />is significantly less than the area that is designated vV1thin the Metro Plan (it may be interpreted that <br />the amOlmt of R-lland exceeds the amount that the City has allocated for the nodal area.) The <br />proposed amendments will ensure that medium density residential land is developed at appropriate <br />densities in conjunction with the mixed-use center. The proposal satisfies the intent of the Metro <br />Plan and this policy. <br /> <br />Table 7: Current llnd Pro <br /> <br />Designation <br />C-1, Neighborhood Commercial <br />C-2, Community Commercial <br />R-1, Low Density Residential <br />R.2, Medium Density Residential <br />PL, Public Land <br />Total <br /> <br />osed Zooin Potential Node S-C <br />Existing Condition <br />Total Acres % Total <br />2.2 2.0~o <br />36.7 33.3% <br />33.5 30.4% <br />32.5 29.5% <br />5.2 4.7% <br />110.2 <br /> <br />Proposed Change <br />Acres Changed % Change Total Acres <br />-2.2 -100.0% 0.0 <br />7.4 20.3% 44.1 <br />-1.3 -4.0% 32.2 <br />1.3 4.1% 33.8 <br />-5.2 -100.0% 0.0 <br />110.2 <br /> <br />% Total <br /> <br />40.1% <br />29.2% <br />30.7% <br /> <br />Source: LCOG data, analysis by Satre Associates, PC <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to develop a horizontal mixed-use center that combines single-use <br />buildings on distinct parcels in a range of land uses in one planned development project. This <br />approach achieves the goal of place making that is made possible by bringing together <br />complimentary uses in one place. In addition, the mixed-use center is within a ten to twenty minute <br />(1/4 mile to Y2 mile) walking distance of public transit and a range of other uses. <br /> <br />The Metro Plan defines Nodal development (node) thusly (p. II-G-8): <br /> <br />Findings- November 19,2007 <br />Page 15 <br />